An in vitro study of resistance to vertical fracture in restored teeth of four types of post and core systems
AsadAlah Ahmadzadeh, Najmeh Mousavi, Farnoush Gol Mohamadi, Ammar Neshati, F Dabaghi, Atabak Askari
Abstract
AsadAlah Ahmadzadeh, Najmeh Mousavi, Farnoush Gol Mohamadi, Ammar Neshati, F Dabaghi, Atabak Askari
Abstract
Background and Objective: Endodontically treated teeth with extensive loss of coronal structure can be restored with various post systems. Choosing a right type of post will affect the life of the final restoration. The aim of study was to investigate the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored using a suggestive and three conventional post systems. Subjects and Methods: Forty extracted and endodontically treated premolars were decoronated 1 mm coronal to CEJ. the teeth were randomly divided into four restorative groups: Group 1, cast post and core; 2, fiber post and composite core; 3, suggestive stainless steel post and composite core; 4, titanium post and composite core. In all groups, posts were cemented with a resin cement (Panavia F). Each root was embedded in an acrylic resin block and loaded vertically in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute until fracture. The data were recorded and analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results: The teeth restored with cast post and core demonstrated fracture resistance (162 N) significantly higher than other groups (P<0.001). The fracture resistance in fiber glass post group (133 N) was significantly higher than that in stainless steel and titanium post groups (P<0.001). The difference of fracture resistance between stainless steel post group (102 N) and titanium post group (90 N) was not significant (P=0.28). Conclusion: The results of study indicated that endodontically treated premolars restored with cast or fiber glass post systems are more resistant to fracture compared to stainless steel and titanium posts.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background and Objective: Endodontically treated teeth with extensive loss of coronal structure can be restored with various post systems. Choosing a right type of post will affect the life of the final restoration. The aim of study was to investigate the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored using a suggestive and three conventional post systems. Subjects and Methods: Forty extracted and endodontically treated premolars were decoronated 1 mm coronal to CEJ. the teeth were randomly divided into four restorative groups: Group 1, cast post and core; 2, fiber post and composite core; 3, suggestive stainless steel post and composite core; 4, titanium post and composite core. In all groups, posts were cemented with a resin cement (Panavia F). Each root was embedded in an acrylic resin block and loaded vertically in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute until fracture. The data were recorded and analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results: The teeth restored with cast post and core demonstrated fracture resistance (162 N) significantly higher than other groups (P<0.001). The fracture resistance in fiber glass post group (133 N) was significantly higher than that in stainless steel and titanium post groups (P<0.001). The difference of fracture resistance between stainless steel post group (102 N) and titanium post group (90 N) was not significant (P=0.28). Conclusion: The results of study indicated that endodontically treated premolars restored with cast or fiber glass post systems are more resistant to fracture compared to stainless steel and titanium posts.
Key concepts: Post and core, Materials science, Universal testing machine, Fracture (geology), Crosshead, Dentistry, Core (optical fiber), Glass fiber