2021Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

On Learning Benefits of Homophily in Firms

Yongha Kwon, Hart E. Posen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Practitioners and scholars have often warned against the negative social consequences of homophily. We consider the implications of homophily for the efficacy of organizational learning. In doing so, we highlight conditions under which homophily may enhance, rather than undermine, a firm’s ability to recombine and exploit individuals’ diverse knowledge. Employing a computational model, we identify two distinct pathways via which homophily influences the interactions between individuals in the organization, which we call the segregating and integrating effects of homophily. While homophily segregates individuals into homophilous social clusters, it also integrates individuals across a firm’s structural units (e.g., teams, divisions, departments). These two competing effects of homophily adjust the firm’s formal structure to drive effective recombination and diffusion of knowledge within the firm. We discuss why this positive role of homophily is more likely to exist in firms than in other social contexts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Practitioners and scholars have often warned against the negative social consequences of homophily. We consider the implications of homophily for the efficacy of organizational learning. In doing so, we highlight conditions under which homophily may enhance, rather than undermine, a firm’s ability to recombine and exploit individuals’ diverse knowledge. Employing a computational model, we identify two distinct pathways via which homophily influences the interactions between individuals in the organization, which we call the segregating and integrating effects of homophily. While homophily segregates individuals into homophilous social clusters, it also integrates individuals across a firm’s structural units (e.g., teams, divisions, departments). These two competing effects of homophily adjust the firm’s formal structure to drive effective recombination and diffusion of knowledge within the firm. We discuss why this positive role of homophily is more likely to exist in firms than in other social contexts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Practitioners and scholars have often warned against the negative social consequences of homophily. We consider the implications of homophily for the efficacy of organizational learning. In doing so, we highlight conditions under which homophily may enhance, rather than undermine, a firm’s ability to recombine and exploit individuals’ diverse knowledge. Employing a computational model, we identify two distinct pathways via which homophily influences the interactions between individuals in the organization, which we call the segregating and integrating effects of homophily. While homophily segregates individuals into homophilous social clusters, it also integrates individuals across a firm’s structural units (e.g., teams, divisions, departments). These two competing effects of homophily adjust the firm’s formal structure to drive effective recombination and diffusion of knowledge within the firm. We discuss why this positive role of homophily is more likely to exist in firms than in other social contexts.

Key concepts: Homophily, Exploit, Social psychology, Psychology, Computer science, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Learning Benefits of Homophily in Firms — Research Paper | ScholarLens