2013•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Trajectories of Democracy in Africa and the Legacies of Democratic Experiments

Nicholas Knowlton

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The end of the Cold War witnessed the largest expansion of democratic liberalization the African continent had experienced since decolonization. However, in spite of such a democratic upsurge, instances of coups, government crises, and institutional stagnation continued to challenge and erode many of the democratic gains made in the immediate aftermath of the Cold War. By 2009, only half of the states previously experiencing such openings could still be widely recognized as democratic. Why is it that some purported democratic transitions continued to thrive for more than twenty years after their initial openings, while others appeared to follow an opposite direction, or stagnate somewhere between democracy and authoritarianism? In answering this question, this paper puts forth a theory of regime trajectories to explain why certain countries followed paths of democracy, while others did not. Such an effort contributes to the scholarly analysis of African politics by not only identifying the types of regime trajectories emerging in the post-Cold War period in Africa, but by also explaining how such trajectories came to be associated with each of the twenty-eight countries contained within this study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The end of the Cold War witnessed the largest expansion of democratic liberalization the African continent had experienced since decolonization. However, in spite of such a democratic upsurge, instances of coups, government crises, and institutional stagnation continued to challenge and erode many of the democratic gains made in the immediate aftermath of the Cold War. By 2009, only half of the states previously experiencing such openings could still be widely recognized as democratic. Why is it that some purported democratic transitions continued to thrive for more than twenty years after their initial openings, while others appeared to follow an opposite direction, or stagnate somewhere between democracy and authoritarianism? In answering this question, this paper puts forth a theory of regime trajectories to explain why certain countries followed paths of democracy, while others did not. Such an effort contributes to the scholarly analysis of African politics by not only identifying the types of regime trajectories emerging in the post-Cold War period in Africa, but by also explaining how such trajectories came to be associated with each of the twenty-eight countries contained within this study.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The end of the Cold War witnessed the largest expansion of democratic liberalization the African continent had experienced since decolonization. However, in spite of such a democratic upsurge, instances of coups, government crises, and institutional stagnation continued to challenge and erode many of the democratic gains made in the immediate aftermath of the Cold War. By 2009, only half of the states previously experiencing such openings could still be widely recognized as democratic. Why is it that some purported democratic transitions continued to thrive for more than twenty years after their initial openings, while others appeared to follow an opposite direction, or stagnate somewhere between democracy and authoritarianism? In answering this question, this paper puts forth a theory of regime trajectories to explain why certain countries followed paths of democracy, while others did not. Such an effort contributes to the scholarly analysis of African politics by not only identifying the types of regime trajectories emerging in the post-Cold War period in Africa, but by also explaining how such trajectories came to be associated with each of the twenty-eight countries contained within this study.

Key concepts: Democracy, Authoritarianism, Liberalization, Political economy, Development economics, Regime change, Cold war, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Trajectories of Democracy in Africa and the Legacies of Democratic Experiments — Research Paper | ScholarLens