2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

Telos and Markets: Aristotle, Burke, and Hayek on the Role of Economics in the Wider Social Order

Gregory M. Collins

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Aristotle’s objection to unlimited commercial exchange as an unnatural activity governed by no moral constraints or teleological aims continues to endure as a powerful criticism of markets. This article applies this criticism to the thought of Edmund Burke and F. A. Hayek. It argues that whereas Hayek’s suspicion of teleology and a hierarchy of ends does leave his embrace of market economies vulnerable to Aristotle’s criticism, Burke overcomes this objection by explicitly subordinating commerce to the religious and moral imperatives of a nation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aristotle’s objection to unlimited commercial exchange as an unnatural activity governed by no moral constraints or teleological aims continues to endure as a powerful criticism of markets. This article applies this criticism to the thought of Edmund Burke and F. A. Hayek. It argues that whereas Hayek’s suspicion of teleology and a hierarchy of ends does leave his embrace of market economies vulnerable to Aristotle’s criticism, Burke overcomes this objection by explicitly subordinating commerce to the religious and moral imperatives of a nation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aristotle’s objection to unlimited commercial exchange as an unnatural activity governed by no moral constraints or teleological aims continues to endure as a powerful criticism of markets. This article applies this criticism to the thought of Edmund Burke and F. A. Hayek. It argues that whereas Hayek’s suspicion of teleology and a hierarchy of ends does leave his embrace of market economies vulnerable to Aristotle’s criticism, Burke overcomes this objection by explicitly subordinating commerce to the religious and moral imperatives of a nation.

Key concepts: Criticism, Teleology, Telos, Order (exchange), Philosophy, Epistemology, Positive economics, Argument (complex analysis)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Telos and Markets: Aristotle, Burke, and Hayek on the Role of Economics in the Wider Social Order — Research Paper | ScholarLens