2021Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

How to Attract Low Prosocial Funders in Crowdfunding?

Yuanqing Li, Pingshu Li, Frank G. Cabano

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Crowdfunding research that investigates funding success factors has been increasing. However, existing research shows inconsistent evidence regarding how a prosocial project description affects funding success and largely ignores the issue of matching/mismatching among different factors in affecting funding success. By conducting two experiments, we provide evidence for matching/mismatching effects among funders, project prosocial descriptions, and platform types (donation-based vs. reward-based). While there are no differences for participants with high prosocial motivation across conditions, we find that participants with low prosocial motivation are more likely to contribute higher funding amounts to a project that has a high prosocial description on a donation-based platform, or to a project that has a low prosocial description on a reward-based platform. Thus, this research sheds light on the crowdfunding and prosocial motivation literature.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Crowdfunding research that investigates funding success factors has been increasing. However, existing research shows inconsistent evidence regarding how a prosocial project description affects funding success and largely ignores the issue of matching/mismatching among different factors in affecting funding success. By conducting two experiments, we provide evidence for matching/mismatching effects among funders, project prosocial descriptions, and platform types (donation-based vs. reward-based). While there are no differences for participants with high prosocial motivation across conditions, we find that participants with low prosocial motivation are more likely to contribute higher funding amounts to a project that has a high prosocial description on a donation-based platform, or to a project that has a low prosocial description on a reward-based platform. Thus, this research sheds light on the crowdfunding and prosocial motivation literature.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Crowdfunding research that investigates funding success factors has been increasing. However, existing research shows inconsistent evidence regarding how a prosocial project description affects funding success and largely ignores the issue of matching/mismatching among different factors in affecting funding success. By conducting two experiments, we provide evidence for matching/mismatching effects among funders, project prosocial descriptions, and platform types (donation-based vs. reward-based). While there are no differences for participants with high prosocial motivation across conditions, we find that participants with low prosocial motivation are more likely to contribute higher funding amounts to a project that has a high prosocial description on a donation-based platform, or to a project that has a low prosocial description on a reward-based platform. Thus, this research sheds light on the crowdfunding and prosocial motivation literature.

Key concepts: Prosocial behavior, Donation, Matching (statistics), Psychology, Social psychology, Altruism (biology), Political science, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How to Attract Low Prosocial Funders in Crowdfunding? — Research Paper | ScholarLens