ScholarLens Back to search
2020•Journal of Applied Economics in Developing CountriesOpen access

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY BETWEEN CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM) AND ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY (APT) IN PREDICTING STOCK RETURN (CASE STUDY: MANUFACTURING COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE FOR THE 2015-2018 PERIOD)

Try Try Wahyuny, Tri Gunarsih

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the accuracy comparison between the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) in predicting stock return in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) for the period 2015 - 2018. CAPM is a model of the relationship between risk and expected return of a security or portfolio. It can be used to determine the price of a risky asset, whereas APT is an approach in determining the price of an asset that is not only based on one variable, but many variables. The variables used in this study consist of market risk premium, inflation, exchange rates (Rp / USD), interest rates, and stock returns. The method used in sampling is purposive sampling. Based on the method, 20 samples of companies with certain criteria were obtained. The data used in this study are secondary data. Secondary data collection was obtained from the Yahoo Finance website, the Bank Indonesia website, and the Ok Stock website, which includes monthly time series data on closing stock prices and the Composite Stock Price Index (CSPI), as well as monthly time series on macroeconomic variables. Data analysis in this study uses Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) by comparing the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT). The results of data calculations show that the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) value on the CAPM model has a value of 0.1096 and the APT model has a value of 0.3631. The smaller the value of Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), it indicates that the regression model is more precise or accurate in predicting the dependent variable, namely stock returns. The results of data analysis show that the CAPM model is more precise or accurate than the APT model in predicting stock returns. Keywords: CAPM, APT, Accuracy, Stock Return

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study aims to analyze the accuracy comparison between the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) in predicting stock return in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) for the period 2015 - 2018. CAPM is a model of the relationship between risk and expected return of a security or portfolio. It can be used to determine the price of a risky asset, whereas APT is an approach in determining the price of an asset that is not only based on one variable, but many variables. The variables used in this study consist of market risk premium, inflation, exchange rates (Rp / USD), interest rates, and stock returns. The method used in sampling is purposive sampling. Based on the method, 20 samples of companies with certain criteria were obtained. The data used in this study are secondary data. Secondary data collection was obtained from the Yahoo Finance website, the Bank Indonesia website, and the Ok Stock website, which includes monthly time series data on closing stock prices and the Composite Stock Price Index (CSPI), as well as monthly time series on macroeconomic variables. Data analysis in this study uses Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) by comparing the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT). The results of data calculations show that the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) value on the CAPM model has a value of 0.1096 and the APT model has a value of 0.3631. The smaller the value of Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), it indicates that the regression model is more precise or accurate in predicting the dependent variable, namely stock returns. The results of data analysis show that the CAPM model is more precise or accurate than the APT model in predicting stock returns. Keywords: CAPM, APT, Accuracy, Stock Return

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study aims to analyze the accuracy comparison between the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) in predicting stock return in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) for the period 2015 - 2018. CAPM is a model of the relationship between risk and expected return of a security or portfolio. It can be used to determine the price of a risky asset, whereas APT is an approach in determining the price of an asset that is not only based on one variable, but many variables. The variables used in this study consist of market risk premium, inflation, exchange rates (Rp / USD), interest rates, and stock returns. The method used in sampling is purposive sampling. Based on the method, 20 samples of companies with certain criteria were obtained. The data used in this study are secondary data. Secondary data collection was obtained from the Yahoo Finance website, the Bank Indonesia website, and the Ok Stock website, which includes monthly time series data on closing stock prices and the Composite Stock Price Index (CSPI), as well as monthly time series on macroeconomic variables. Data analysis in this study uses Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) by comparing the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT). The results of data calculations show that the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) value on the CAPM model has a value of 0.1096 and the APT model has a value of 0.3631. The smaller the value of Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), it indicates that the regression model is more precise or accurate in predicting the dependent variable, namely stock returns. The results of data analysis show that the CAPM model is more precise or accurate than the APT model in predicting stock returns. Keywords: CAPM, APT, Accuracy, Stock Return

Key concepts: Capital asset pricing model, Arbitrage pricing theory, Stock exchange, Financial economics, Consumption-based capital asset pricing model, Econometrics, Economics, Security market line

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY BETWEEN CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM) AND ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY (APT) IN PREDICTING STOCK RETURN (CASE STUDY: MANUFACTURING COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE FOR THE 2015-2018 PERIOD) — Research Paper | ScholarLens