Marine spatial planning: Facilitating sustainability in an ocean of ambiguity
Trine Skovgaard Kirkfeldt
Abstract
Open-access reader
Trine Skovgaard Kirkfeldt
Abstract
Open-access reader
This dissertation explores the practice of Marine Spatial Planning and its role in facilitating sustainability at sea. Five papers have been developed for this purpose. They contribute to the discussion of how Marine Spatial Planning is facilitating sustainability by exploring central elements of the EU Directive on Marine Spatial Planning as well as how ambiguous formulations in policies affect the practice and outcome. The concept of an ‘ecosystem-based approach’ is evaluated and best practices are compared. In relation to this, the assessment of collective pressure by Member States is evaluated and the concept of sustainability in relation to Marine Spatial Planning is explored and debated. Marine Spatial Planning is found to have a larger potential in facilitating sustainability, than what is currently perceived by established frameworks. Current practices in the EU vary greatly due to the ambiguous and open formulations of the Directive. While some practices take shape of an experimental implementation with successful and innovative outcomes, other practices neglects key elements such as the assessment of the collective pressure.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This dissertation explores the practice of Marine Spatial Planning and its role in facilitating sustainability at sea. Five papers have been developed for this purpose. They contribute to the discussion of how Marine Spatial Planning is facilitating sustainability by exploring central elements of the EU Directive on Marine Spatial Planning as well as how ambiguous formulations in policies affect the practice and outcome. The concept of an ‘ecosystem-based approach’ is evaluated and best practices are compared. In relation to this, the assessment of collective pressure by Member States is evaluated and the concept of sustainability in relation to Marine Spatial Planning is explored and debated. Marine Spatial Planning is found to have a larger potential in facilitating sustainability, than what is currently perceived by established frameworks. Current practices in the EU vary greatly due to the ambiguous and open formulations of the Directive. While some practices take shape of an experimental implementation with successful and innovative outcomes, other practices neglects key elements such as the assessment of the collective pressure.
Key concepts: Marine spatial planning, Sustainability, Spatial planning, Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Directive, Ambiguity, Environmental resource management, Environmental planning