2011SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

A Work of Art or a Labor of Love? Rousseau on Artistic Creation, Love and the Social Contract

Çiğdem Çıdam

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Although there is a wide-ranging literature on the role that patriotism (l’amour de la patrie) plays in Rousseau’s political thought, the existing literature considers patriotism, at best, complementary, at worst, irrelevant to Rousseau’s understanding of popular sovereignty. In opposition to these interpretations, this paper highlights the centrality of patriotism for Rousseau’s political theory. Focusing on Rousseau’s so-called ‘non-political,’ fictional writings that were contemporaneous with the Social Contract, I provide a new reading of Rousseau’s account of popular sovereignty in light of his conceptualization of love (amour) in Emile and especially in his final play Pygmalion. My argument is that although there is no explicit discussion of patriotism in the Social Contract, Rousseau’s concept of popular sovereignty can be fully comprehended only through the lenses of his peculiar understanding of love which, in its search for immediacy, leaves no place for any kind of mediation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although there is a wide-ranging literature on the role that patriotism (l’amour de la patrie) plays in Rousseau’s political thought, the existing literature considers patriotism, at best, complementary, at worst, irrelevant to Rousseau’s understanding of popular sovereignty. In opposition to these interpretations, this paper highlights the centrality of patriotism for Rousseau’s political theory. Focusing on Rousseau’s so-called ‘non-political,’ fictional writings that were contemporaneous with the Social Contract, I provide a new reading of Rousseau’s account of popular sovereignty in light of his conceptualization of love (amour) in Emile and especially in his final play Pygmalion. My argument is that although there is no explicit discussion of patriotism in the Social Contract, Rousseau’s concept of popular sovereignty can be fully comprehended only through the lenses of his peculiar understanding of love which, in its search for immediacy, leaves no place for any kind of mediation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although there is a wide-ranging literature on the role that patriotism (l’amour de la patrie) plays in Rousseau’s political thought, the existing literature considers patriotism, at best, complementary, at worst, irrelevant to Rousseau’s understanding of popular sovereignty. In opposition to these interpretations, this paper highlights the centrality of patriotism for Rousseau’s political theory. Focusing on Rousseau’s so-called ‘non-political,’ fictional writings that were contemporaneous with the Social Contract, I provide a new reading of Rousseau’s account of popular sovereignty in light of his conceptualization of love (amour) in Emile and especially in his final play Pygmalion. My argument is that although there is no explicit discussion of patriotism in the Social Contract, Rousseau’s concept of popular sovereignty can be fully comprehended only through the lenses of his peculiar understanding of love which, in its search for immediacy, leaves no place for any kind of mediation.

Key concepts: Social contract, Patriotism, Popular sovereignty, Sovereignty, Politics, Argument (complex analysis), Aesthetics, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Work of Art or a Labor of Love? Rousseau on Artistic Creation, Love and the Social Contract — Research Paper | ScholarLens