2021International Journal of Public Law and PolicyRequires access

Legal framework for compulsory licensing: a solution to the conflict of intellectual property rights and intellectual monopoly

Naheeda Ali, Kanwal Iqbal Khan

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Intellectual property laws remain a debatable topic for the scholars as well as for the practitioners since the last two decades. Recently, it attracted the attention of many individuals due to its conflicting role in the field of law and economics. The economist considers intellectual property rights as a necessary evil that leads towards intellectual monopoly, whereas law takes it as a protection shield for individual rights. This study is an attempt to discuss the controversial role of intellectual property rights and suggests the necessary solution to overcome the normative obstacles from the way of intellectual property laws. It elucidate the positive side of intellectual property laws that they protect inventors, its knowledge and spirit to work for the welfare of the society by feeling that their properties are intellectually and financially secure. On the other hand, it opens the new avenues for the competitive free market that encourages the new entrants for start-ups. Finally, this article highlighted the benefits of intellectual property that it does not deprive the people of developing or least developed countries from the right of quality life through compulsory licenses under the legal framework of intellectual property laws, TPIPS.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Intellectual property laws remain a debatable topic for the scholars as well as for the practitioners since the last two decades. Recently, it attracted the attention of many individuals due to its conflicting role in the field of law and economics. The economist considers intellectual property rights as a necessary evil that leads towards intellectual monopoly, whereas law takes it as a protection shield for individual rights. This study is an attempt to discuss the controversial role of intellectual property rights and suggests the necessary solution to overcome the normative obstacles from the way of intellectual property laws. It elucidate the positive side of intellectual property laws that they protect inventors, its knowledge and spirit to work for the welfare of the society by feeling that their properties are intellectually and financially secure. On the other hand, it opens the new avenues for the competitive free market that encourages the new entrants for start-ups. Finally, this article highlighted the benefits of intellectual property that it does not deprive the people of developing or least developed countries from the right of quality life through compulsory licenses under the legal framework of intellectual property laws, TPIPS.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Intellectual property laws remain a debatable topic for the scholars as well as for the practitioners since the last two decades. Recently, it attracted the attention of many individuals due to its conflicting role in the field of law and economics. The economist considers intellectual property rights as a necessary evil that leads towards intellectual monopoly, whereas law takes it as a protection shield for individual rights. This study is an attempt to discuss the controversial role of intellectual property rights and suggests the necessary solution to overcome the normative obstacles from the way of intellectual property laws. It elucidate the positive side of intellectual property laws that they protect inventors, its knowledge and spirit to work for the welfare of the society by feeling that their properties are intellectually and financially secure. On the other hand, it opens the new avenues for the competitive free market that encourages the new entrants for start-ups. Finally, this article highlighted the benefits of intellectual property that it does not deprive the people of developing or least developed countries from the right of quality life through compulsory licenses under the legal framework of intellectual property laws, TPIPS.

Key concepts: Intellectual property, Monopoly, Law and economics, Intangible property, Normative, Law, Economics, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Legal framework for compulsory licensing: a solution to the conflict of intellectual property rights and intellectual monopoly — Research Paper | ScholarLens