Heterogeneity in Risk Preferences: Evidence from a Real-World Betting Market
Angie Andrikogiannopoulou, Filippos Papakonstantinou
Abstract
Angie Andrikogiannopoulou, Filippos Papakonstantinou
Abstract
We develop a structural model of behavior that accounts for individual heterogeneity within and across utility 'types' characterized by different features of risk preferences, and we estimate it using a unique dataset of individual activity in a sports wagering market. We estimate the population distribution of utility curvature, loss aversion, and probability weighting, and we evaluate their importance in explaining behavior. We find — for the first time using individual-level field data — that all features of prospect theory are present outside the lab: Individuals have heterogeneous risk attitudes, but on average they are risk averse (loving) over gains (losses), exhibit loss aversion, and overweight the probabilities of extreme outcomes. Furthermore, we find that utility curvature alone does not explain choices and that, while loss aversion is important, probability weighting is the most prevalent behavioral feature of risk attitudes: Two thirds of individuals exhibit loss aversion, but all exhibit probability weighting.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We develop a structural model of behavior that accounts for individual heterogeneity within and across utility 'types' characterized by different features of risk preferences, and we estimate it using a unique dataset of individual activity in a sports wagering market. We estimate the population distribution of utility curvature, loss aversion, and probability weighting, and we evaluate their importance in explaining behavior. We find — for the first time using individual-level field data — that all features of prospect theory are present outside the lab: Individuals have heterogeneous risk attitudes, but on average they are risk averse (loving) over gains (losses), exhibit loss aversion, and overweight the probabilities of extreme outcomes. Furthermore, we find that utility curvature alone does not explain choices and that, while loss aversion is important, probability weighting is the most prevalent behavioral feature of risk attitudes: Two thirds of individuals exhibit loss aversion, but all exhibit probability weighting.
Key concepts: Weighting, Loss aversion, Risk aversion (psychology), Prospect theory, Econometrics, Expected utility hypothesis, Economics, Behavioral economics