2021Journal of Environmental EngineeringRequires access

Experimental and Modeling Comparisons of Ash-Treated Pine Biochar and Activated Carbon for the Adsorption of Dissolved Organic Matter and Organic Micropollutants

Anthony M. Kennedy, Miguel Arias‐Paić, Matthew J. Bentley, R. Scott Summers

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

A novel powdered ash-treated pine biochar (PATB) was compared to powdered activated carbon (PAC) for the removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and organic micropollutants (OMPs) from deionized water (DI), raw surface water (SW), and treated wastewater (WW). PATB performance (capacity and kinetics) was the primary focus under realistic water treatment adsorbent doses (<200 mg/L) and contact times (<120 min). For the removal of DOM, iohexol (IOH), sucralose (SUC), and sulfamethoxazole, PAC consistently outperformed PATB. For the more readily adsorbable OMPs carbamazepine, cotinine, DEET, and theobromine, removal by the two adsorbents was comparable. Dose-response and kinetic results for each adsorbent between SW and WW for DOM, IOH, and SUC were similar, as their initial dissolved organic carbon concentrations were diluted to the same range: 2.0–2.2 mg/L. SUC was found to have a higher affinity for PATB in DI, but ultimate removal was still limited by its lower specific surface area compared to PAC (∼500 versus ∼1,000 m2/g). Additional investigations included combined adsorbent treatment and projecting batch results to fixed-bed breakthrough curves for hypothetical full-scale granular activated carbon and granular ash-treated biochar adsorbers using both the homogeneous surface diffusion model and pore and surface diffusion model.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A novel powdered ash-treated pine biochar (PATB) was compared to powdered activated carbon (PAC) for the removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and organic micropollutants (OMPs) from deionized water (DI), raw surface water (SW), and treated wastewater (WW). PATB performance (capacity and kinetics) was the primary focus under realistic water treatment adsorbent doses (<200 mg/L) and contact times (<120 min). For the removal of DOM, iohexol (IOH), sucralose (SUC), and sulfamethoxazole, PAC consistently outperformed PATB. For the more readily adsorbable OMPs carbamazepine, cotinine, DEET, and theobromine, removal by the two adsorbents was comparable. Dose-response and kinetic results for each adsorbent between SW and WW for DOM, IOH, and SUC were similar, as their initial dissolved organic carbon concentrations were diluted to the same range: 2.0–2.2 mg/L. SUC was found to have a higher affinity for PATB in DI, but ultimate removal was still limited by its lower specific surface area compared to PAC (∼500 versus ∼1,000 m2/g). Additional investigations included combined adsorbent treatment and projecting batch results to fixed-bed breakthrough curves for hypothetical full-scale granular activated carbon and granular ash-treated biochar adsorbers using both the homogeneous surface diffusion model and pore and surface diffusion model.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A novel powdered ash-treated pine biochar (PATB) was compared to powdered activated carbon (PAC) for the removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and organic micropollutants (OMPs) from deionized water (DI), raw surface water (SW), and treated wastewater (WW). PATB performance (capacity and kinetics) was the primary focus under realistic water treatment adsorbent doses (<200 mg/L) and contact times (<120 min). For the removal of DOM, iohexol (IOH), sucralose (SUC), and sulfamethoxazole, PAC consistently outperformed PATB. For the more readily adsorbable OMPs carbamazepine, cotinine, DEET, and theobromine, removal by the two adsorbents was comparable. Dose-response and kinetic results for each adsorbent between SW and WW for DOM, IOH, and SUC were similar, as their initial dissolved organic carbon concentrations were diluted to the same range: 2.0–2.2 mg/L. SUC was found to have a higher affinity for PATB in DI, but ultimate removal was still limited by its lower specific surface area compared to PAC (∼500 versus ∼1,000 m2/g). Additional investigations included combined adsorbent treatment and projecting batch results to fixed-bed breakthrough curves for hypothetical full-scale granular activated carbon and granular ash-treated biochar adsorbers using both the homogeneous surface diffusion model and pore and surface diffusion model.

Key concepts: Biochar, Chemistry, Adsorption, Activated carbon, Dissolved organic carbon, Powdered activated carbon treatment, Environmental chemistry, Total organic carbon

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental and Modeling Comparisons of Ash-Treated Pine Biochar and Activated Carbon for the Adsorption of Dissolved Organic Matter and Organic Micropollutants — Research Paper | ScholarLens