1989•ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)Open access

Junk Mail and the Bar: United States Supreme Court Ends Its Silence (And Much of the Confusion) Regarding Targeted Direct Mail Advertising by Attorneys by Invalidating ABA Model Rule 7.3: Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S. Ct. 1916, 100 L. Ed. 2d 475 (1988)

Gregory M. Perry

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Discusses Kentucky case, Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association which examines targeted direct mailing which is in violation of Kentucky Supreme Court Rule 3.135(5)(b)(i). \nThe ruling was appealed to the Kentucky Supreme Court. Eventually, the United States Supreme Court struck down the rule as violative of first amendment protections for commercial speech. The article provides discussion and history of commercial speech and professional advertising.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Discusses Kentucky case, Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association which examines targeted direct mailing which is in violation of Kentucky Supreme Court Rule 3.135(5)(b)(i). \nThe ruling was appealed to the Kentucky Supreme Court. Eventually, the United States Supreme Court struck down the rule as violative of first amendment protections for commercial speech. The article provides discussion and history of commercial speech and professional advertising.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Discusses Kentucky case, Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association which examines targeted direct mailing which is in violation of Kentucky Supreme Court Rule 3.135(5)(b)(i). \nThe ruling was appealed to the Kentucky Supreme Court. Eventually, the United States Supreme Court struck down the rule as violative of first amendment protections for commercial speech. The article provides discussion and history of commercial speech and professional advertising.

Key concepts: Confusion, Direct mail, Supreme court, Silence, Advertising, Bar (unit), Mail order, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Junk Mail and the Bar: United States Supreme Court Ends Its Silence (And Much of the Confusion) Regarding Targeted Direct Mail Advertising by Attorneys by Invalidating ABA Model Rule 7.3: Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S. Ct. 1916, 100 L. Ed. 2d 475 (1988) — Research Paper | ScholarLens