Cognitive Capacity Assessment
Swati Bajpai, Ashima Nehra, RM Pandey, Hemchand Sati, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Venugopalan Y. Vishnu, Roopa Rajan, Manmohan Singh, Achal Kumar Srivastava, M.V. Padma Srivastava, Manjari Tripathi
Abstract
Swati Bajpai, Ashima Nehra, RM Pandey, Hemchand Sati, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Venugopalan Y. Vishnu, Roopa Rajan, Manmohan Singh, Achal Kumar Srivastava, M.V. Padma Srivastava, Manjari Tripathi
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disability evaluation as per World Health Organization includes assessment of impairments, activity limitations, and participation restriction, which unfortunately is not assessed by the existing guidelines of disability in India. AIM: The aim of this study wasto comparea new study criterion with the existing guidelines for assessing cognitive disability for chronic neurological conditions. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted on 41 participants. They were assessed on an existing guideline (Gazette India 200,1 assessing physical domain and Intelligence Quotient[IQ]) and study criterion assessing three aspects of cognitive capacity: IQ, neurocognitive functioning, and QOL. RESULTS: The existing guideline underestimated 84% of cases for disability. The average percentage of disability measured by the study criterion was 33.2% more as compared to existing guidelines with S.D of 26.6. CONCLUSION: Cognitive capacity assessment is an important element to be measured in chronic neurological disability certification. However, a large sample is required to make an affirmative claim for the same.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: Disability evaluation as per World Health Organization includes assessment of impairments, activity limitations, and participation restriction, which unfortunately is not assessed by the existing guidelines of disability in India. AIM: The aim of this study wasto comparea new study criterion with the existing guidelines for assessing cognitive disability for chronic neurological conditions. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted on 41 participants. They were assessed on an existing guideline (Gazette India 200,1 assessing physical domain and Intelligence Quotient[IQ]) and study criterion assessing three aspects of cognitive capacity: IQ, neurocognitive functioning, and QOL. RESULTS: The existing guideline underestimated 84% of cases for disability. The average percentage of disability measured by the study criterion was 33.2% more as compared to existing guidelines with S.D of 26.6. CONCLUSION: Cognitive capacity assessment is an important element to be measured in chronic neurological disability certification. However, a large sample is required to make an affirmative claim for the same.
Key concepts: Neurocognitive, Medicine, Guideline, Cognition, Certification, Cognitive impairment, Physical disability, Cognitive disabilities