ScholarLens Back to search
2021•Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)Open access

Disparate Treatment Employment Discrimination

James N. Phillips

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

See infra notes 37-56 and accompanying text.11.The survey period covers cases decided by the Tenth Circuit between September 1, 1998 and August 31, 1999.12. 42 U.S.C. § § 2000e to 2000e-17.13. 29 U.S.C. § § 621-634 (1994); see O'Connor v. Consol.Coin Caterers Corp., 517 U.S. 308, 311 (1996) (stating that "[w]e have never had occasion to decide whether that application of the Title VII rule to the ADEA context is correct, but since the parties do not contest that point, we shall assume it.").14. 42 U.S.C.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

See infra notes 37-56 and accompanying text.11.The survey period covers cases decided by the Tenth Circuit between September 1, 1998 and August 31, 1999.12. 42 U.S.C. § § 2000e to 2000e-17.13. 29 U.S.C. § § 621-634 (1994); see O'Connor v. Consol.Coin Caterers Corp., 517 U.S. 308, 311 (1996) (stating that "[w]e have never had occasion to decide whether that application of the Title VII rule to the ADEA context is correct, but since the parties do not contest that point, we shall assume it.").14. 42 U.S.C.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

See infra notes 37-56 and accompanying text.11.The survey period covers cases decided by the Tenth Circuit between September 1, 1998 and August 31, 1999.12. 42 U.S.C. § § 2000e to 2000e-17.13. 29 U.S.C. § § 621-634 (1994); see O'Connor v. Consol.Coin Caterers Corp., 517 U.S. 308, 311 (1996) (stating that "[w]e have never had occasion to decide whether that application of the Title VII rule to the ADEA context is correct, but since the parties do not contest that point, we shall assume it.").14. 42 U.S.C.

Key concepts: Employment discrimination, Disparate treatment, Political science, Psychology, Economics, Labour economics, Law, Labour law

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Disparate Treatment Employment Discrimination — Research Paper | ScholarLens