2021Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The Practicians

Jean d’Aspremont

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter reviews the dominant approach in which customary international law gets in validity, its legality, its consistency, and its factuality from practice and opinio juris. It investigates the presumptive character of the moment where practice and opinio juris coalesce and generate customary international law, which must be ascribed a genitor. It also emphasizes that as long as practice and opinio juris have a sufficient number of genitors, they can be conducive to the formation of customary international law. The chapter talks about practicians as the genitors of the practice which customary international law must emanate from, such as those that produce the actual behaviours (practice sensu stricto) and the beliefs (opinio juris) that are generative of customary international law. It outlines the determination of the practicians of customary international law as a discursive performance that is commonly and repeatedly witnessed in debates about customary international law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This chapter reviews the dominant approach in which customary international law gets in validity, its legality, its consistency, and its factuality from practice and opinio juris. It investigates the presumptive character of the moment where practice and opinio juris coalesce and generate customary international law, which must be ascribed a genitor. It also emphasizes that as long as practice and opinio juris have a sufficient number of genitors, they can be conducive to the formation of customary international law. The chapter talks about practicians as the genitors of the practice which customary international law must emanate from, such as those that produce the actual behaviours (practice sensu stricto) and the beliefs (opinio juris) that are generative of customary international law. It outlines the determination of the practicians of customary international law as a discursive performance that is commonly and repeatedly witnessed in debates about customary international law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This chapter reviews the dominant approach in which customary international law gets in validity, its legality, its consistency, and its factuality from practice and opinio juris. It investigates the presumptive character of the moment where practice and opinio juris coalesce and generate customary international law, which must be ascribed a genitor. It also emphasizes that as long as practice and opinio juris have a sufficient number of genitors, they can be conducive to the formation of customary international law. The chapter talks about practicians as the genitors of the practice which customary international law must emanate from, such as those that produce the actual behaviours (practice sensu stricto) and the beliefs (opinio juris) that are generative of customary international law. It outlines the determination of the practicians of customary international law as a discursive performance that is commonly and repeatedly witnessed in debates about customary international law.

Key concepts: Customary international law, Principle of legality, Sources of international law, Consistency (knowledge bases), Law, International law, Political science, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Practicians — Research Paper | ScholarLens