1996•New York Law School’s Digital Commons (New York Law School)Open access

Politics and the Rehnquist Court

James F. Simon

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The Center Holds: The Power Struggle Inside the Rehnquist Court' provided "fascinating" detail of the inner workings of the Rehnquist Court. 2 He also said that I was wrong, dead wrong, in my conclusion that the center has held.3 He then discussed decisions from last term which, he conceded, were not decided when my book went to press.Nonetheless, Toobin concluded those decisions completely undermined my thesis.Jeffrey Rosen in his review of my book in the Sunday New York Times wrote that The Center Holds was "a fine book," "lively and accessible" and "meticulously researched."'It was, however, his sad duty to report that I was wrong, at least in the civil rights field, as a result of last term's conservative decisions.' Daniel Kornstein in his review of my book inThe Baltimore Sun wrote that The Center Holds was "a superb book," full of insights into the working and direction of the Rehnquist Court.' Happily, Kornstein did not say I was wrong, but he did write that I had put forward a "radical"

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Center Holds: The Power Struggle Inside the Rehnquist Court' provided "fascinating" detail of the inner workings of the Rehnquist Court. 2 He also said that I was wrong, dead wrong, in my conclusion that the center has held.3 He then discussed decisions from last term which, he conceded, were not decided when my book went to press.Nonetheless, Toobin concluded those decisions completely undermined my thesis.Jeffrey Rosen in his review of my book in the Sunday New York Times wrote that The Center Holds was "a fine book," "lively and accessible" and "meticulously researched."'It was, however, his sad duty to report that I was wrong, at least in the civil rights field, as a result of last term's conservative decisions.' Daniel Kornstein in his review of my book inThe Baltimore Sun wrote that The Center Holds was "a superb book," full of insights into the working and direction of the Rehnquist Court.' Happily, Kornstein did not say I was wrong, but he did write that I had put forward a "radical"

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Center Holds: The Power Struggle Inside the Rehnquist Court' provided "fascinating" detail of the inner workings of the Rehnquist Court. 2 He also said that I was wrong, dead wrong, in my conclusion that the center has held.3 He then discussed decisions from last term which, he conceded, were not decided when my book went to press.Nonetheless, Toobin concluded those decisions completely undermined my thesis.Jeffrey Rosen in his review of my book in the Sunday New York Times wrote that The Center Holds was "a fine book," "lively and accessible" and "meticulously researched."'It was, however, his sad duty to report that I was wrong, at least in the civil rights field, as a result of last term's conservative decisions.' Daniel Kornstein in his review of my book inThe Baltimore Sun wrote that The Center Holds was "a superb book," full of insights into the working and direction of the Rehnquist Court.' Happily, Kornstein did not say I was wrong, but he did write that I had put forward a "radical"

Key concepts: Politics, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Politics and the Rehnquist Court — Research Paper | ScholarLens