2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Urban planning for resilience

Aditya Bahadur, Thomas Tanner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Urban planning has played a central role in efforts for enhancing urban climate and disaster resilience, with global narratives emphasising formal mechanisms as a key tool. Master plans, city development plans and land use plans have helped build resilience by determining what is built (i.e. development control), how it is built (i.e. design control) and where it is built (i.e. location control). However, we contend that this approach is flawed in many cities of the world where large numbers of people in urban centres at risk of climate change live in informal settlements and are dependent on the informal economy for livelihoods. We argue that to bring a comprehensive vision of urban resilience to life, it is crucial that planners embrace informal knowledge, actors and practices. Balancing a focus on formal planning with a greater understanding of informality will deliver effective pathways for enhancing urban resilience.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Urban planning has played a central role in efforts for enhancing urban climate and disaster resilience, with global narratives emphasising formal mechanisms as a key tool. Master plans, city development plans and land use plans have helped build resilience by determining what is built (i.e. development control), how it is built (i.e. design control) and where it is built (i.e. location control). However, we contend that this approach is flawed in many cities of the world where large numbers of people in urban centres at risk of climate change live in informal settlements and are dependent on the informal economy for livelihoods. We argue that to bring a comprehensive vision of urban resilience to life, it is crucial that planners embrace informal knowledge, actors and practices. Balancing a focus on formal planning with a greater understanding of informality will deliver effective pathways for enhancing urban resilience.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Urban planning has played a central role in efforts for enhancing urban climate and disaster resilience, with global narratives emphasising formal mechanisms as a key tool. Master plans, city development plans and land use plans have helped build resilience by determining what is built (i.e. development control), how it is built (i.e. design control) and where it is built (i.e. location control). However, we contend that this approach is flawed in many cities of the world where large numbers of people in urban centres at risk of climate change live in informal settlements and are dependent on the informal economy for livelihoods. We argue that to bring a comprehensive vision of urban resilience to life, it is crucial that planners embrace informal knowledge, actors and practices. Balancing a focus on formal planning with a greater understanding of informality will deliver effective pathways for enhancing urban resilience.

Key concepts: Resilience (materials science), Environmental planning, Urban resilience, Geography, Urban planning, Civil engineering, Engineering, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Urban planning for resilience — Research Paper | ScholarLens