2008The FASEB JournalRequires access

Discriminative stimulus effects of hallucinogens and psychostimulants in S(+)‐MDMA, and R(−)‐MDMA trained mice

Kevin Sean Murnane, Leonard Lee Howell, William E. Fantegrossi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

3,4‐Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is an amphetamine derivative with increasingly widespread abuse. MDMA has been difficult to classify as a stimulant or hallucinogen because it shares effects with both drug classes. Furthermore, racemic MDMA is composed of two isomers that vary in terms of behavioral effects rather than simple potency differences. Specifically, the R(−) isomer of MDMA has hallucinogen like effects whereas the S(+) isomer has stimulant like effects. In the present study, mice were trained under a liquid food reinforcer two lever operant paradigm to discriminate S(+) or R(−)‐MDMA from vehicle. Drugs that are hallucinogen like and either structurally similar (2,5‐dimethoxy‐4‐(n)‐propylthiophenethylamine ‐ 2C‐T‐7) or not (N,N‐Dipropyltryptamine ‐ DPT) and drugs that are stimulant like and either structurally similar (Amphetamine) or not (Cocaine) were substituted for the training drug in mice trained to discriminate each isomer. Within chemical class we have found apparent efficacy differences whereas within behavioral class we have found potency differences. These studies enlighten our understanding of the complex nature of the discriminative stimulus properties of MDMA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

3,4‐Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is an amphetamine derivative with increasingly widespread abuse. MDMA has been difficult to classify as a stimulant or hallucinogen because it shares effects with both drug classes. Furthermore, racemic MDMA is composed of two isomers that vary in terms of behavioral effects rather than simple potency differences. Specifically, the R(−) isomer of MDMA has hallucinogen like effects whereas the S(+) isomer has stimulant like effects. In the present study, mice were trained under a liquid food reinforcer two lever operant paradigm to discriminate S(+) or R(−)‐MDMA from vehicle. Drugs that are hallucinogen like and either structurally similar (2,5‐dimethoxy‐4‐(n)‐propylthiophenethylamine ‐ 2C‐T‐7) or not (N,N‐Dipropyltryptamine ‐ DPT) and drugs that are stimulant like and either structurally similar (Amphetamine) or not (Cocaine) were substituted for the training drug in mice trained to discriminate each isomer. Within chemical class we have found apparent efficacy differences whereas within behavioral class we have found potency differences. These studies enlighten our understanding of the complex nature of the discriminative stimulus properties of MDMA.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

3,4‐Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is an amphetamine derivative with increasingly widespread abuse. MDMA has been difficult to classify as a stimulant or hallucinogen because it shares effects with both drug classes. Furthermore, racemic MDMA is composed of two isomers that vary in terms of behavioral effects rather than simple potency differences. Specifically, the R(−) isomer of MDMA has hallucinogen like effects whereas the S(+) isomer has stimulant like effects. In the present study, mice were trained under a liquid food reinforcer two lever operant paradigm to discriminate S(+) or R(−)‐MDMA from vehicle. Drugs that are hallucinogen like and either structurally similar (2,5‐dimethoxy‐4‐(n)‐propylthiophenethylamine ‐ 2C‐T‐7) or not (N,N‐Dipropyltryptamine ‐ DPT) and drugs that are stimulant like and either structurally similar (Amphetamine) or not (Cocaine) were substituted for the training drug in mice trained to discriminate each isomer. Within chemical class we have found apparent efficacy differences whereas within behavioral class we have found potency differences. These studies enlighten our understanding of the complex nature of the discriminative stimulus properties of MDMA.

Key concepts: MDMA, Hallucinogen, Amphetamine, Stimulant, Psychology, Designer drug, Stimulus control, Dextroamphetamine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discriminative stimulus effects of hallucinogens and psychostimulants in S(+)‐MDMA, and R(−)‐MDMA trained mice — Research Paper | ScholarLens