2021•Digital Repository Universitas Negeri Medan (Universitas Negeri Medan)Open access

CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE IN DIALOGUE OF “LAYAR TERKEMBANG” NOVEL BY SUTAN TAKDIR ALISJAHBANA

Tika Mulyani, Meisuri Meisuri, Widya Andayani

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This study dealt with Conversational Implicature in Dialogue of Layar Terkembang Novel By Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana based on Grice’s Theory. The objectives of this study were to find out the types of Conversational Implicature, to describe the Conversational Implicature used in the dialogue, and to explain the reasons for certain type of Conversational Implicature becomes dominant. This research was conducted by using descriptive qualitative method. The data were taken from the dialogue of Layar Terkembang novelby Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana published by Balai Pustaka in 1963 as source of data. The finding showed that there were two types of conversational implicature namely Generalized Implicature that belong to 33 utterances and Particularized Implicature that belong to 36 utterances. Generalized used when the context was free and the hearer didn’t need specific context. Then Particularized used when the hearer need specific context and should have prior knowledge to interpret the implicit meaning. There were some reasons that certain type becomes dominant such as the simple words were not enough to describe their sentence, the sentence more contained ambiguity, implicit meaning, conveyed an additional meaning, and their response did not relevant with every question. So it cannot easily to understand what he/she said.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study dealt with Conversational Implicature in Dialogue of Layar Terkembang Novel By Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana based on Grice’s Theory. The objectives of this study were to find out the types of Conversational Implicature, to describe the Conversational Implicature used in the dialogue, and to explain the reasons for certain type of Conversational Implicature becomes dominant. This research was conducted by using descriptive qualitative method. The data were taken from the dialogue of Layar Terkembang novelby Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana published by Balai Pustaka in 1963 as source of data. The finding showed that there were two types of conversational implicature namely Generalized Implicature that belong to 33 utterances and Particularized Implicature that belong to 36 utterances. Generalized used when the context was free and the hearer didn’t need specific context. Then Particularized used when the hearer need specific context and should have prior knowledge to interpret the implicit meaning. There were some reasons that certain type becomes dominant such as the simple words were not enough to describe their sentence, the sentence more contained ambiguity, implicit meaning, conveyed an additional meaning, and their response did not relevant with every question. So it cannot easily to understand what he/she said.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study dealt with Conversational Implicature in Dialogue of Layar Terkembang Novel By Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana based on Grice’s Theory. The objectives of this study were to find out the types of Conversational Implicature, to describe the Conversational Implicature used in the dialogue, and to explain the reasons for certain type of Conversational Implicature becomes dominant. This research was conducted by using descriptive qualitative method. The data were taken from the dialogue of Layar Terkembang novelby Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana published by Balai Pustaka in 1963 as source of data. The finding showed that there were two types of conversational implicature namely Generalized Implicature that belong to 33 utterances and Particularized Implicature that belong to 36 utterances. Generalized used when the context was free and the hearer didn’t need specific context. Then Particularized used when the hearer need specific context and should have prior knowledge to interpret the implicit meaning. There were some reasons that certain type becomes dominant such as the simple words were not enough to describe their sentence, the sentence more contained ambiguity, implicit meaning, conveyed an additional meaning, and their response did not relevant with every question. So it cannot easily to understand what he/she said.

Key concepts: Implicature, Meaning (existential), Grice, Ambiguity, Linguistics, Psychology, Computer science, Pragmatics

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE IN DIALOGUE OF “LAYAR TERKEMBANG” NOVEL BY SUTAN TAKDIR ALISJAHBANA — Research Paper | ScholarLens