2019Unpublished venueRequires access

2. Misoverestimating Terrorism

John Mueller, Mark G. Stewart

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

While it is not true that 9/11 “changed everything,” the tragedy did have a powerful impact in some areas. Terrorism’s apparent incidence and intensity, and therefore its seeming importance, has been multiplied by effectively conflating it with insurgency. Accordingly, the category may be going out of existence—and the same could even happen for civil war much international war. In addition, extrapolating wildly from the apparent capacities of the 9/11 hijackers, some have greatly exaggerated the threat presented internationally by small bands of terrorists, sometimes even to the point of deeming it to be existential—a process that may be repeating itself with the vicious group called ISIS or the Islamic State. This chapter examines what might be called the misoverestimation of terrorism—playing on a verbal invention of George W. Bush. It also assesses the limited importance of the terrorism phenomenon more generally.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While it is not true that 9/11 “changed everything,” the tragedy did have a powerful impact in some areas. Terrorism’s apparent incidence and intensity, and therefore its seeming importance, has been multiplied by effectively conflating it with insurgency. Accordingly, the category may be going out of existence—and the same could even happen for civil war much international war. In addition, extrapolating wildly from the apparent capacities of the 9/11 hijackers, some have greatly exaggerated the threat presented internationally by small bands of terrorists, sometimes even to the point of deeming it to be existential—a process that may be repeating itself with the vicious group called ISIS or the Islamic State. This chapter examines what might be called the misoverestimation of terrorism—playing on a verbal invention of George W. Bush. It also assesses the limited importance of the terrorism phenomenon more generally.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While it is not true that 9/11 “changed everything,” the tragedy did have a powerful impact in some areas. Terrorism’s apparent incidence and intensity, and therefore its seeming importance, has been multiplied by effectively conflating it with insurgency. Accordingly, the category may be going out of existence—and the same could even happen for civil war much international war. In addition, extrapolating wildly from the apparent capacities of the 9/11 hijackers, some have greatly exaggerated the threat presented internationally by small bands of terrorists, sometimes even to the point of deeming it to be existential—a process that may be repeating itself with the vicious group called ISIS or the Islamic State. This chapter examines what might be called the misoverestimation of terrorism—playing on a verbal invention of George W. Bush. It also assesses the limited importance of the terrorism phenomenon more generally.

Key concepts: Terrorism, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
2. Misoverestimating Terrorism — Research Paper | ScholarLens