Going Against the Consociational Grain: The Debate on the Dutch Advisory Referendum Act and the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement Referendum
Reijer Passchier, W.J.M. Voermans
Abstract
Reijer Passchier, W.J.M. Voermans
Abstract
On April 6, 2016, the Netherlands held the first referendum under its new Advisory Referendum Act of 2015. Most Dutch commentators feel that this experience not an altogether gratifying experience. This blog reports on three of the most prominent critical claims made. Although some of these claims do make sense to a certain extent, the blog argues that the greater part of the discontent with the referendum actually goes a lot deeper: referendums seem to go against the grain of the time honoured Dutch political consensus culture.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
On April 6, 2016, the Netherlands held the first referendum under its new Advisory Referendum Act of 2015. Most Dutch commentators feel that this experience not an altogether gratifying experience. This blog reports on three of the most prominent critical claims made. Although some of these claims do make sense to a certain extent, the blog argues that the greater part of the discontent with the referendum actually goes a lot deeper: referendums seem to go against the grain of the time honoured Dutch political consensus culture.
Key concepts: Referendum, Political science, Politics, Law, Political economy, Public administration, Sociology