2016•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Going Against the Consociational Grain: The Debate on the Dutch Advisory Referendum Act and the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement Referendum

Reijer Passchier, W.J.M. Voermans

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

On April 6, 2016, the Netherlands held the first referendum under its new Advisory Referendum Act of 2015. Most Dutch commentators feel that this experience not an altogether gratifying experience. This blog reports on three of the most prominent critical claims made. Although some of these claims do make sense to a certain extent, the blog argues that the greater part of the discontent with the referendum actually goes a lot deeper: referendums seem to go against the grain of the time honoured Dutch political consensus culture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On April 6, 2016, the Netherlands held the first referendum under its new Advisory Referendum Act of 2015. Most Dutch commentators feel that this experience not an altogether gratifying experience. This blog reports on three of the most prominent critical claims made. Although some of these claims do make sense to a certain extent, the blog argues that the greater part of the discontent with the referendum actually goes a lot deeper: referendums seem to go against the grain of the time honoured Dutch political consensus culture.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On April 6, 2016, the Netherlands held the first referendum under its new Advisory Referendum Act of 2015. Most Dutch commentators feel that this experience not an altogether gratifying experience. This blog reports on three of the most prominent critical claims made. Although some of these claims do make sense to a certain extent, the blog argues that the greater part of the discontent with the referendum actually goes a lot deeper: referendums seem to go against the grain of the time honoured Dutch political consensus culture.

Key concepts: Referendum, Political science, Politics, Law, Political economy, Public administration, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Going Against the Consociational Grain: The Debate on the Dutch Advisory Referendum Act and the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement Referendum — Research Paper | ScholarLens