20212021 2nd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET)Requires access

A Comparative Analysis of Domino Techniques for Improved Performance

Anurag Ravish, Sumit Kale

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, for the first time, we have performed comparative analysis of different styles of domino circuits, based on average power consumption, unity noise margin (UNM) and number of transistors associated with them under same delay i.e., 120ps (iso-delay). The domino logic circuits which have been compared are conventional domino with and without evaluation transistor, diode footed domino (DFD), voltage comparison domino (VCD), low power Domino (LPD), controlled keeper by current comparison domino (CKCCD) and, high-speed domino (HSD). Simulations performed for S-bit OR gate using a 180nm CMOS technology model at an operational temperature of 110°C and supply voltage of l.8V in Cadence Virtuoso tool. Results are compared with conventional domino with evaluation transistor. It has been found that low power domino (LPD) gives the best results considering all three performance parameters, in terms of 93.6% power reduction and 1.317x improvement in noise immunity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, for the first time, we have performed comparative analysis of different styles of domino circuits, based on average power consumption, unity noise margin (UNM) and number of transistors associated with them under same delay i.e., 120ps (iso-delay). The domino logic circuits which have been compared are conventional domino with and without evaluation transistor, diode footed domino (DFD), voltage comparison domino (VCD), low power Domino (LPD), controlled keeper by current comparison domino (CKCCD) and, high-speed domino (HSD). Simulations performed for S-bit OR gate using a 180nm CMOS technology model at an operational temperature of 110°C and supply voltage of l.8V in Cadence Virtuoso tool. Results are compared with conventional domino with evaluation transistor. It has been found that low power domino (LPD) gives the best results considering all three performance parameters, in terms of 93.6% power reduction and 1.317x improvement in noise immunity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, for the first time, we have performed comparative analysis of different styles of domino circuits, based on average power consumption, unity noise margin (UNM) and number of transistors associated with them under same delay i.e., 120ps (iso-delay). The domino logic circuits which have been compared are conventional domino with and without evaluation transistor, diode footed domino (DFD), voltage comparison domino (VCD), low power Domino (LPD), controlled keeper by current comparison domino (CKCCD) and, high-speed domino (HSD). Simulations performed for S-bit OR gate using a 180nm CMOS technology model at an operational temperature of 110°C and supply voltage of l.8V in Cadence Virtuoso tool. Results are compared with conventional domino with evaluation transistor. It has been found that low power domino (LPD) gives the best results considering all three performance parameters, in terms of 93.6% power reduction and 1.317x improvement in noise immunity.

Key concepts: Domino, Domino logic, CMOS, Noise margin, Transistor, Electronic engineering, Computer science, Cadence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Analysis of Domino Techniques for Improved Performance — Research Paper | ScholarLens