2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Why and How should We Value Unpaid Work?

Connie Bayudan‐Dacuycuy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Housework, also called unpaid work or nonmarket work, is performed across countries and societies to enhance the well-being of individuals in households. Yet, it is not recognized as real work nor is it valued in the measurement of economic output. This Policy Note discusses why housework is a social issue and why and how it should be recognized and valued. The study finds that although housework is a choice that is decided within the household, it has important implications on human capital accumulation. Women tend to be more affected by market work interruptions caused by housework than men given their child-bearing and child-nurturing roles. The study recommends the crafting of policies and programs that can achieve the goals of empowering men and women through economic independence and help them perform their productive and reproductive roles. Specifically, it suggests to broaden opportunities for both men and women who opt out of the market work by enhancing work from home opportunities and explore granting of incentives to working couples by making a portion of child care receipts deductible from the couple’s income. It also highlights the need to improve public services that have direct and indirect consequences on unpaid work, such as having good and reliable child-care services that coincide with the eight-hour office schedule to encourage mothers to go back to work after childbirth. Further, the study recommends reforming the workplace to achieve work-life balance by legislating laws along the lines of flexi-time and the expanded maternity/paternity benefits. Lastly, the study advocates to strengthen public awareness on the value of unpaid work through information campaigns.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Housework, also called unpaid work or nonmarket work, is performed across countries and societies to enhance the well-being of individuals in households. Yet, it is not recognized as real work nor is it valued in the measurement of economic output. This Policy Note discusses why housework is a social issue and why and how it should be recognized and valued. The study finds that although housework is a choice that is decided within the household, it has important implications on human capital accumulation. Women tend to be more affected by market work interruptions caused by housework than men given their child-bearing and child-nurturing roles. The study recommends the crafting of policies and programs that can achieve the goals of empowering men and women through economic independence and help them perform their productive and reproductive roles. Specifically, it suggests to broaden opportunities for both men and women who opt out of the market work by enhancing work from home opportunities and explore granting of incentives to working couples by making a portion of child care receipts deductible from the couple’s income. It also highlights the need to improve public services that have direct and indirect consequences on unpaid work, such as having good and reliable child-care services that coincide with the eight-hour office schedule to encourage mothers to go back to work after childbirth. Further, the study recommends reforming the workplace to achieve work-life balance by legislating laws along the lines of flexi-time and the expanded maternity/paternity benefits. Lastly, the study advocates to strengthen public awareness on the value of unpaid work through information campaigns.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Housework, also called unpaid work or nonmarket work, is performed across countries and societies to enhance the well-being of individuals in households. Yet, it is not recognized as real work nor is it valued in the measurement of economic output. This Policy Note discusses why housework is a social issue and why and how it should be recognized and valued. The study finds that although housework is a choice that is decided within the household, it has important implications on human capital accumulation. Women tend to be more affected by market work interruptions caused by housework than men given their child-bearing and child-nurturing roles. The study recommends the crafting of policies and programs that can achieve the goals of empowering men and women through economic independence and help them perform their productive and reproductive roles. Specifically, it suggests to broaden opportunities for both men and women who opt out of the market work by enhancing work from home opportunities and explore granting of incentives to working couples by making a portion of child care receipts deductible from the couple’s income. It also highlights the need to improve public services that have direct and indirect consequences on unpaid work, such as having good and reliable child-care services that coincide with the eight-hour office schedule to encourage mothers to go back to work after childbirth. Further, the study recommends reforming the workplace to achieve work-life balance by legislating laws along the lines of flexi-time and the expanded maternity/paternity benefits. Lastly, the study advocates to strengthen public awareness on the value of unpaid work through information campaigns.

Key concepts: Unpaid work, Work (physics), Value (mathematics), Labour economics, Economics, Business, Computer science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Why and How should We Value Unpaid Work? — Research Paper | ScholarLens