2021SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Common Good Originalism: Our Tradition and Our Path Forward

Josh Hammer

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

For far too long, originalist scholarship and taxonomy has been divided between libertarian progressive and originalism. But so-called originalism, as it has usually been historically formulated, is usually avowedly positivist and rooted in Thayerian deference or other proceduralist norms of judicial restraint. This paper argues that this is wrong. Just as libertarian originalism and progressive originalism entail an inherent element of substance, so too can a genuinely, substantively conservative strand of originalist jurisprudence be theorized. In fact, this paper argues, such a strand of originalism is our true Anglo-American constitutional inheritance: common good originalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For far too long, originalist scholarship and taxonomy has been divided between libertarian progressive and originalism. But so-called originalism, as it has usually been historically formulated, is usually avowedly positivist and rooted in Thayerian deference or other proceduralist norms of judicial restraint. This paper argues that this is wrong. Just as libertarian originalism and progressive originalism entail an inherent element of substance, so too can a genuinely, substantively conservative strand of originalist jurisprudence be theorized. In fact, this paper argues, such a strand of originalism is our true Anglo-American constitutional inheritance: common good originalism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For far too long, originalist scholarship and taxonomy has been divided between libertarian progressive and originalism. But so-called originalism, as it has usually been historically formulated, is usually avowedly positivist and rooted in Thayerian deference or other proceduralist norms of judicial restraint. This paper argues that this is wrong. Just as libertarian originalism and progressive originalism entail an inherent element of substance, so too can a genuinely, substantively conservative strand of originalist jurisprudence be theorized. In fact, this paper argues, such a strand of originalism is our true Anglo-American constitutional inheritance: common good originalism.

Key concepts: Originalism, Law, Original meaning, Jurisprudence, Proposition, Scholarship, Political science, Constitution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Common Good Originalism: Our Tradition and Our Path Forward — Research Paper | ScholarLens