2021•International Journal of Portfolio Analysis and ManagementRequires access

Asset allocation and downside risk

Joel R. Barber

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Economists have long recognised that investors care more about downside risk than total variation, which includes upside gains. This paper develops a new technique, along the lines of Sharpe's (1990, 1992) asset-class model, to measure the performance of an actively managed portfolio with respect to downside risk. The new technique involves choosing a multiple asset-class benchmark with the highest possible correlation with the active strategy return subject to the constraint that the risks are the same. The risk-matched portfolio can be used to measure the performance of an active portfolio with respect to downside risk. Because, by construction the risk of the benchmark is the same as the active portfolio, it is a simple matter to compare the performance of the active to the benchmark using the Sortino ratio. To illustrate the new technique, we compare the performance of exchange traded funds that track S&P equal-weighted and value weighed sector indexes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Economists have long recognised that investors care more about downside risk than total variation, which includes upside gains. This paper develops a new technique, along the lines of Sharpe's (1990, 1992) asset-class model, to measure the performance of an actively managed portfolio with respect to downside risk. The new technique involves choosing a multiple asset-class benchmark with the highest possible correlation with the active strategy return subject to the constraint that the risks are the same. The risk-matched portfolio can be used to measure the performance of an active portfolio with respect to downside risk. Because, by construction the risk of the benchmark is the same as the active portfolio, it is a simple matter to compare the performance of the active to the benchmark using the Sortino ratio. To illustrate the new technique, we compare the performance of exchange traded funds that track S&P equal-weighted and value weighed sector indexes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Economists have long recognised that investors care more about downside risk than total variation, which includes upside gains. This paper develops a new technique, along the lines of Sharpe's (1990, 1992) asset-class model, to measure the performance of an actively managed portfolio with respect to downside risk. The new technique involves choosing a multiple asset-class benchmark with the highest possible correlation with the active strategy return subject to the constraint that the risks are the same. The risk-matched portfolio can be used to measure the performance of an active portfolio with respect to downside risk. Because, by construction the risk of the benchmark is the same as the active portfolio, it is a simple matter to compare the performance of the active to the benchmark using the Sortino ratio. To illustrate the new technique, we compare the performance of exchange traded funds that track S&P equal-weighted and value weighed sector indexes.

Key concepts: Downside risk, Asset allocation, Asset (computer security), Business, Economics, Risk analysis (engineering), Computer science, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Asset allocation and downside risk — Research Paper | ScholarLens