2018Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Transcendental Realism and Kant’s Critique of Speculative Metaphysics

Marcus Willaschek

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Chapter 9 examines Kant’s critique of metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason. We discuss transcendental realism and its relation to transcendental idealism and then argue that rejecting transcendental realism does not presuppose transcendental idealism. Next, we will see that even on its most general level, Kant’s critique of metaphysics does depends not on transcendental idealism but on the much more specific claim that human cognition is limited to sensible objects. Finally, we will distinguish between different interpretations of Kant’s account of transcendental ideas and argue for a radical reading according to which, when viewed in a purely speculative context, ideas of reason fail to represent (really possible) objects, which accounts for the third level of Kant’s critique of metaphysics. Our result will be that Kant develops a challenging critique of speculative metaphysics that does not presuppose his transcendental idealism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chapter 9 examines Kant’s critique of metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason. We discuss transcendental realism and its relation to transcendental idealism and then argue that rejecting transcendental realism does not presuppose transcendental idealism. Next, we will see that even on its most general level, Kant’s critique of metaphysics does depends not on transcendental idealism but on the much more specific claim that human cognition is limited to sensible objects. Finally, we will distinguish between different interpretations of Kant’s account of transcendental ideas and argue for a radical reading according to which, when viewed in a purely speculative context, ideas of reason fail to represent (really possible) objects, which accounts for the third level of Kant’s critique of metaphysics. Our result will be that Kant develops a challenging critique of speculative metaphysics that does not presuppose his transcendental idealism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chapter 9 examines Kant’s critique of metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason. We discuss transcendental realism and its relation to transcendental idealism and then argue that rejecting transcendental realism does not presuppose transcendental idealism. Next, we will see that even on its most general level, Kant’s critique of metaphysics does depends not on transcendental idealism but on the much more specific claim that human cognition is limited to sensible objects. Finally, we will distinguish between different interpretations of Kant’s account of transcendental ideas and argue for a radical reading according to which, when viewed in a purely speculative context, ideas of reason fail to represent (really possible) objects, which accounts for the third level of Kant’s critique of metaphysics. Our result will be that Kant develops a challenging critique of speculative metaphysics that does not presuppose his transcendental idealism.

Key concepts: Transcendental idealism, Transcendental philosophy, Transcendental number, Metaphysics, Idealism, Philosophy, Epistemology, Realism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transcendental Realism and Kant’s Critique of Speculative Metaphysics — Research Paper | ScholarLens