2021Cogent Social SciencesOpen access

Political decentralization, fiscal centralization, and its consequences in case of Pakistan

Fayaz Hussain Tunio, Agha Amad Nabi

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

The political and fiscal institutions are arguably the most significant factors that determine the way a society operates. Some countries, such as the USA and Canada, have decentralized political and fiscal institutions, and some are centralized, e.g., China and Singapore. However, this is not true in Pakistan. This paper, first, explains that Pakistan has decentralized political and centralized fiscal institutions. It then describes how the Pakistan government and interest groups interact with each other within such an asymmetric system. Finally, it analyzes the consequences, how governments and interest groups’ interaction leads to cultural polarization, and centralization of the taxation system, which carries the public debts at the uncontrolled threshold.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The political and fiscal institutions are arguably the most significant factors that determine the way a society operates. Some countries, such as the USA and Canada, have decentralized political and fiscal institutions, and some are centralized, e.g., China and Singapore. However, this is not true in Pakistan. This paper, first, explains that Pakistan has decentralized political and centralized fiscal institutions. It then describes how the Pakistan government and interest groups interact with each other within such an asymmetric system. Finally, it analyzes the consequences, how governments and interest groups’ interaction leads to cultural polarization, and centralization of the taxation system, which carries the public debts at the uncontrolled threshold.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The political and fiscal institutions are arguably the most significant factors that determine the way a society operates. Some countries, such as the USA and Canada, have decentralized political and fiscal institutions, and some are centralized, e.g., China and Singapore. However, this is not true in Pakistan. This paper, first, explains that Pakistan has decentralized political and centralized fiscal institutions. It then describes how the Pakistan government and interest groups interact with each other within such an asymmetric system. Finally, it analyzes the consequences, how governments and interest groups’ interaction leads to cultural polarization, and centralization of the taxation system, which carries the public debts at the uncontrolled threshold.

Key concepts: Decentralization, Politics, Economics, Debt, Political system, Polarization (electrochemistry), China, Fiscal system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Political decentralization, fiscal centralization, and its consequences in case of Pakistan — Research Paper | ScholarLens