2018•RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library)Requires access

Cost benefit analysis: the state of the art in Australia

Todd Denham, Jago Dodson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Cost benefit analysis is the economic appraisal of project proposals, it is a tool for assessing and comparing a range of public policy and infrastructure projects to inform decision makers as to their net social benefits and help determine priorities based on marginal costs and benefits. A review of recent cost benefit analyses, supported by Auditors General reports, academic literature and media reports provides some evidence of a number of issues for further investigation. In particular, the controversial and large-scale projects WestConnex and the East West Link provide examples of the issues under consideration. The novel approach taken here is to focus on practice, procedural and institutional issues, rather than the technical application of cost benefit methodologies. While some of the issues considered have appeared frequently in the literature, the article provides new insights the innovation bias towards increasing benefit estimation, and the alignment of risks and rewards within the appraisal industry. This article is not intended to be a cost benefit analysis of CBA; it reviews and discusses contemporary issues with project appraisal and business cases for major infrastructure projects. By focusing on recent critiques, some of the discussion may appear to be biased towards a critical rather than balanced perspective. It provides a foundation for further research and considered debate on the role of CBA and the processes by which major infrastructure decisions are being made in this country.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cost benefit analysis is the economic appraisal of project proposals, it is a tool for assessing and comparing a range of public policy and infrastructure projects to inform decision makers as to their net social benefits and help determine priorities based on marginal costs and benefits. A review of recent cost benefit analyses, supported by Auditors General reports, academic literature and media reports provides some evidence of a number of issues for further investigation. In particular, the controversial and large-scale projects WestConnex and the East West Link provide examples of the issues under consideration. The novel approach taken here is to focus on practice, procedural and institutional issues, rather than the technical application of cost benefit methodologies. While some of the issues considered have appeared frequently in the literature, the article provides new insights the innovation bias towards increasing benefit estimation, and the alignment of risks and rewards within the appraisal industry. This article is not intended to be a cost benefit analysis of CBA; it reviews and discusses contemporary issues with project appraisal and business cases for major infrastructure projects. By focusing on recent critiques, some of the discussion may appear to be biased towards a critical rather than balanced perspective. It provides a foundation for further research and considered debate on the role of CBA and the processes by which major infrastructure decisions are being made in this country.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cost benefit analysis is the economic appraisal of project proposals, it is a tool for assessing and comparing a range of public policy and infrastructure projects to inform decision makers as to their net social benefits and help determine priorities based on marginal costs and benefits. A review of recent cost benefit analyses, supported by Auditors General reports, academic literature and media reports provides some evidence of a number of issues for further investigation. In particular, the controversial and large-scale projects WestConnex and the East West Link provide examples of the issues under consideration. The novel approach taken here is to focus on practice, procedural and institutional issues, rather than the technical application of cost benefit methodologies. While some of the issues considered have appeared frequently in the literature, the article provides new insights the innovation bias towards increasing benefit estimation, and the alignment of risks and rewards within the appraisal industry. This article is not intended to be a cost benefit analysis of CBA; it reviews and discusses contemporary issues with project appraisal and business cases for major infrastructure projects. By focusing on recent critiques, some of the discussion may appear to be biased towards a critical rather than balanced perspective. It provides a foundation for further research and considered debate on the role of CBA and the processes by which major infrastructure decisions are being made in this country.

Key concepts: Computer science, State (computer science), Programming language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost benefit analysis: the state of the art in Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens