2001•Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Open access

Analysis of Florida Department of Transportation Transit Corridor Program/Projects: Technical Memoranda Numbers One, Two, and Three

Cutr

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Task 2 builds on Task 1 with the emphasis on Identifying the success and failure of Transit Corridor projects.This information Is provided In Technical Memorandum Two entitled "Summary of Transit Corridor Projects Strengths and Weaknesses."It is intended that the results of this analysis may also be presented at the Florida Transit Association's annual or mid-year conferences.Finally, in Task 3 CUTR interviewed Involved FDOT personnel at both the Central Office and District Offices to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the overall Transit Corridor Program.CUTR also studied the FDOT Transit Corridor Procedure, Topic Number 725-030-003-d, reviewing the sections developed for program management and implementation; funding and eligible costs; capital acquisition and management; and project implementation and monitoring.From these efforts recommendations have been provided In Technical Memorandum Three to improve the Transit Corridor Procedure and .relatedprocesses.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Task 2 builds on Task 1 with the emphasis on Identifying the success and failure of Transit Corridor projects.This information Is provided In Technical Memorandum Two entitled "Summary of Transit Corridor Projects Strengths and Weaknesses."It is intended that the results of this analysis may also be presented at the Florida Transit Association's annual or mid-year conferences.Finally, in Task 3 CUTR interviewed Involved FDOT personnel at both the Central Office and District Offices to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the overall Transit Corridor Program.CUTR also studied the FDOT Transit Corridor Procedure, Topic Number 725-030-003-d, reviewing the sections developed for program management and implementation; funding and eligible costs; capital acquisition and management; and project implementation and monitoring.From these efforts recommendations have been provided In Technical Memorandum Three to improve the Transit Corridor Procedure and .relatedprocesses.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Task 2 builds on Task 1 with the emphasis on Identifying the success and failure of Transit Corridor projects.This information Is provided In Technical Memorandum Two entitled "Summary of Transit Corridor Projects Strengths and Weaknesses."It is intended that the results of this analysis may also be presented at the Florida Transit Association's annual or mid-year conferences.Finally, in Task 3 CUTR interviewed Involved FDOT personnel at both the Central Office and District Offices to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the overall Transit Corridor Program.CUTR also studied the FDOT Transit Corridor Procedure, Topic Number 725-030-003-d, reviewing the sections developed for program management and implementation; funding and eligible costs; capital acquisition and management; and project implementation and monitoring.From these efforts recommendations have been provided In Technical Memorandum Three to improve the Transit Corridor Procedure and .relatedprocesses.

Key concepts: Transit (satellite), Transport engineering, Geography, Public transport, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Florida Department of Transportation Transit Corridor Program/Projects: Technical Memoranda Numbers One, Two, and Three — Research Paper | ScholarLens