Alexander Zahar, Göran Sluiter
Abstract
The chapter argues that the subject of genocide law has been emotionally and politically charged at the United Nations' international criminal tribunals, with the result that the law on genocide developed there rests on weak foundations and is internally inconsistent.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The chapter argues that the subject of genocide law has been emotionally and politically charged at the United Nations' international criminal tribunals, with the result that the law on genocide developed there rests on weak foundations and is internally inconsistent.
Key concepts: Genocide, Political science, Subject (documents), Law, Criminal law, International law, Criminology, Sociology