2019SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

A Comparision of Some Inefficient Liability Rules: Conditions on the Domain of Applications

Rajendra Prasad Kundu, Debabrata Pal

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

When negligence is defined as failure to take some cost-justified precaution the standard liability rules of no liability, strict liability, negligence, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence are all inefficient if the domain of applications is not restricted. This paper characterises the domain of applications for which the negligence rule is better than the rules of no liability, strict liability, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When negligence is defined as failure to take some cost-justified precaution the standard liability rules of no liability, strict liability, negligence, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence are all inefficient if the domain of applications is not restricted. This paper characterises the domain of applications for which the negligence rule is better than the rules of no liability, strict liability, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When negligence is defined as failure to take some cost-justified precaution the standard liability rules of no liability, strict liability, negligence, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence are all inefficient if the domain of applications is not restricted. This paper characterises the domain of applications for which the negligence rule is better than the rules of no liability, strict liability, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence.

Key concepts: Liability, Contributory negligence, Strict liability, Business, Res ipsa loquitur, Tort, Actuarial science, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparision of Some Inefficient Liability Rules: Conditions on the Domain of Applications — Research Paper | ScholarLens