A Comparision of Some Inefficient Liability Rules: Conditions on the Domain of Applications
Rajendra Prasad Kundu, Debabrata Pal
Abstract
Rajendra Prasad Kundu, Debabrata Pal
Abstract
When negligence is defined as failure to take some cost-justified precaution the standard liability rules of no liability, strict liability, negligence, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence are all inefficient if the domain of applications is not restricted. This paper characterises the domain of applications for which the negligence rule is better than the rules of no liability, strict liability, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
When negligence is defined as failure to take some cost-justified precaution the standard liability rules of no liability, strict liability, negligence, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence are all inefficient if the domain of applications is not restricted. This paper characterises the domain of applications for which the negligence rule is better than the rules of no liability, strict liability, strict liability with the defence of contributory negligence and negligence, with the defence of contributory negligence.
Key concepts: Liability, Contributory negligence, Strict liability, Business, Res ipsa loquitur, Tort, Actuarial science, Law and economics