2006•CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)Open access

The X-Ray Luminosity--Mass Relation for Local Clusters of Galaxies

R. Stanek, AUGUST E. EVRARD, Böhringer, H., P. Schuecker, B. Nord

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between soft \xray luminosity and mass for low redshift clusters of galaxies by comparing observed number counts to expectations of $Λ$CDM cosmologies. We use a three-parameter model for the conditional probability of luminosity given mass and epoch, described as a log-normal distribution of fixed width centered on a power-law scaling relation, $L \spropto M^p\rhoc^s(z)$. We use an ensemble of simulated clusters to argue that the observed, intrinsic variance in the temperature--luminosity relation is directly indicative of mass--luminosity variance, and derive $\sigm \se 0.43 \pm 0.06$ from HIFLUGCS data. Adding this to the likelihood analysis results in best-fit estimates $p \se 1.59 \pm 0.05$, $\lnlf \se 1.34 \pm 0.09$, and $\sigm \se 0.37 \pm 0.05$ for self-similar redshift evolution in a concordance ($Ω_m \se 0.3$, $Ω_Λ\se 0.7$, $σ_8 \se0.9$) universe. We show that the present-epoch intercept is very sensitive to power spectrum normalization, $\lnlf \spropto \sigate^{-4}$, and the slope is weakly sensitive to the matter density, $p \spropto Ω_m^{1/2}$. The intercept derived here is dimmer by a factor 2, and slope slightly steeper, than the L-M relation published using hydrostatic mass estimates of the HIFLUGCS sample. We show that this discrepancy is largely due to Malmquist bias of the \xray\ flux-limited sample. In light of new WMAP constraints, we discuss the interplay between parameters and sources of systematic error, and offer a compromise model with $Ω_m \se 0.24$, $σ_8 \se 0.85$, and somewhat lower scatter $\sigm \se 0.25$, in which hydrostatic mass estimates remain accurate to $\ssim 15%$. We stress the need for independent calibration of the L-M relation via weak gravitational lensing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We investigate the relationship between soft \xray luminosity and mass for low redshift clusters of galaxies by comparing observed number counts to expectations of $Λ$CDM cosmologies. We use a three-parameter model for the conditional probability of luminosity given mass and epoch, described as a log-normal distribution of fixed width centered on a power-law scaling relation, $L \spropto M^p\rhoc^s(z)$. We use an ensemble of simulated clusters to argue that the observed, intrinsic variance in the temperature--luminosity relation is directly indicative of mass--luminosity variance, and derive $\sigm \se 0.43 \pm 0.06$ from HIFLUGCS data. Adding this to the likelihood analysis results in best-fit estimates $p \se 1.59 \pm 0.05$, $\lnlf \se 1.34 \pm 0.09$, and $\sigm \se 0.37 \pm 0.05$ for self-similar redshift evolution in a concordance ($Ω_m \se 0.3$, $Ω_Λ\se 0.7$, $σ_8 \se0.9$) universe. We show that the present-epoch intercept is very sensitive to power spectrum normalization, $\lnlf \spropto \sigate^{-4}$, and the slope is weakly sensitive to the matter density, $p \spropto Ω_m^{1/2}$. The intercept derived here is dimmer by a factor 2, and slope slightly steeper, than the L-M relation published using hydrostatic mass estimates of the HIFLUGCS sample. We show that this discrepancy is largely due to Malmquist bias of the \xray\ flux-limited sample. In light of new WMAP constraints, we discuss the interplay between parameters and sources of systematic error, and offer a compromise model with $Ω_m \se 0.24$, $σ_8 \se 0.85$, and somewhat lower scatter $\sigm \se 0.25$, in which hydrostatic mass estimates remain accurate to $\ssim 15%$. We stress the need for independent calibration of the L-M relation via weak gravitational lensing.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We investigate the relationship between soft \xray luminosity and mass for low redshift clusters of galaxies by comparing observed number counts to expectations of $Λ$CDM cosmologies. We use a three-parameter model for the conditional probability of luminosity given mass and epoch, described as a log-normal distribution of fixed width centered on a power-law scaling relation, $L \spropto M^p\rhoc^s(z)$. We use an ensemble of simulated clusters to argue that the observed, intrinsic variance in the temperature--luminosity relation is directly indicative of mass--luminosity variance, and derive $\sigm \se 0.43 \pm 0.06$ from HIFLUGCS data. Adding this to the likelihood analysis results in best-fit estimates $p \se 1.59 \pm 0.05$, $\lnlf \se 1.34 \pm 0.09$, and $\sigm \se 0.37 \pm 0.05$ for self-similar redshift evolution in a concordance ($Ω_m \se 0.3$, $Ω_Λ\se 0.7$, $σ_8 \se0.9$) universe. We show that the present-epoch intercept is very sensitive to power spectrum normalization, $\lnlf \spropto \sigate^{-4}$, and the slope is weakly sensitive to the matter density, $p \spropto Ω_m^{1/2}$. The intercept derived here is dimmer by a factor 2, and slope slightly steeper, than the L-M relation published using hydrostatic mass estimates of the HIFLUGCS sample. We show that this discrepancy is largely due to Malmquist bias of the \xray\ flux-limited sample. In light of new WMAP constraints, we discuss the interplay between parameters and sources of systematic error, and offer a compromise model with $Ω_m \se 0.24$, $σ_8 \se 0.85$, and somewhat lower scatter $\sigm \se 0.25$, in which hydrostatic mass estimates remain accurate to $\ssim 15%$. We stress the need for independent calibration of the L-M relation via weak gravitational lensing.

Key concepts: Astrophysics, Relation (database), Astronomy, Luminosity, Galaxy, Physics, Galaxy cluster, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The X-Ray Luminosity--Mass Relation for Local Clusters of Galaxies — Research Paper | ScholarLens