2021The FASEB JournalRequires access

Transport of the Chemokines CCL5 and CCL2 Across the Mouse Blood‐Brain Barrier under Physiological and Inflammatory Conditions

Daniel Quaranta, Michelle A. Erickson, Riley Weaver, William A. Banks

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Chemokines are important regulators of neuroinflammation and interact with brain endothelial cells that comprise the blood‐brain barrier (BBB) to modulate their function and promote their interactions with leukocytes. Chemokines can also cross the intact BBB, which may contribute to their functions in the brain, but interactions of chemokines with the BBB in vivo are understudied. Here, we show that the chemokines C‐C motif ligand 2 (CCL2) and C‐C motif ligand 5 (CCL5), which have been well‐studied in context of their neuroinflammatory functions, are amenable to labeling with 125 I. This affords highly sensitive and quantitative detection of CCL2 and CCL5 in vivo, and allows for rapid assessment of the distribution of circulating chemokines. Multiple‐time regression analysis was used to characterize chemokine transport across the mouse BBB. In untreated mice, we evaluated the brain uptake of CCL2 and CCL5 and characterized saturability of uptake and endothelial binding vs. transport. We then determined whether CCL2 and CCL5 interactions with the BBB are altered in mice treated with three doses of 3mg/kg lipopolysaccharide. Our results indicate that in addition to endothelial binding at the glycocalyx, there is uptake of both CCL5 and CCL2 into the mouse brain parenchyma. We found no significant difference in the rate of chemokine uptake in mice treated with LPS versus untreated mice. However, the 125 I counts per minute (CPM) was significantly higher in the brains of LPS mice versus untreated mice brains, indicating that more radio‐labelled chemokine had entered the brain after LPS‐induced inflammation. In conclusion, we have found that chemokines interact with the intact BBB, and alterations in theses interactions with inflammation can be detected in vivo. As a future direction, this method can be utilized to evaluate pharmacological approaches to inhibiting BBB/chemokine interactions, which may protect against harmful neuroinflammation during neurological disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chemokines are important regulators of neuroinflammation and interact with brain endothelial cells that comprise the blood‐brain barrier (BBB) to modulate their function and promote their interactions with leukocytes. Chemokines can also cross the intact BBB, which may contribute to their functions in the brain, but interactions of chemokines with the BBB in vivo are understudied. Here, we show that the chemokines C‐C motif ligand 2 (CCL2) and C‐C motif ligand 5 (CCL5), which have been well‐studied in context of their neuroinflammatory functions, are amenable to labeling with 125 I. This affords highly sensitive and quantitative detection of CCL2 and CCL5 in vivo, and allows for rapid assessment of the distribution of circulating chemokines. Multiple‐time regression analysis was used to characterize chemokine transport across the mouse BBB. In untreated mice, we evaluated the brain uptake of CCL2 and CCL5 and characterized saturability of uptake and endothelial binding vs. transport. We then determined whether CCL2 and CCL5 interactions with the BBB are altered in mice treated with three doses of 3mg/kg lipopolysaccharide. Our results indicate that in addition to endothelial binding at the glycocalyx, there is uptake of both CCL5 and CCL2 into the mouse brain parenchyma. We found no significant difference in the rate of chemokine uptake in mice treated with LPS versus untreated mice. However, the 125 I counts per minute (CPM) was significantly higher in the brains of LPS mice versus untreated mice brains, indicating that more radio‐labelled chemokine had entered the brain after LPS‐induced inflammation. In conclusion, we have found that chemokines interact with the intact BBB, and alterations in theses interactions with inflammation can be detected in vivo. As a future direction, this method can be utilized to evaluate pharmacological approaches to inhibiting BBB/chemokine interactions, which may protect against harmful neuroinflammation during neurological disease.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chemokines are important regulators of neuroinflammation and interact with brain endothelial cells that comprise the blood‐brain barrier (BBB) to modulate their function and promote their interactions with leukocytes. Chemokines can also cross the intact BBB, which may contribute to their functions in the brain, but interactions of chemokines with the BBB in vivo are understudied. Here, we show that the chemokines C‐C motif ligand 2 (CCL2) and C‐C motif ligand 5 (CCL5), which have been well‐studied in context of their neuroinflammatory functions, are amenable to labeling with 125 I. This affords highly sensitive and quantitative detection of CCL2 and CCL5 in vivo, and allows for rapid assessment of the distribution of circulating chemokines. Multiple‐time regression analysis was used to characterize chemokine transport across the mouse BBB. In untreated mice, we evaluated the brain uptake of CCL2 and CCL5 and characterized saturability of uptake and endothelial binding vs. transport. We then determined whether CCL2 and CCL5 interactions with the BBB are altered in mice treated with three doses of 3mg/kg lipopolysaccharide. Our results indicate that in addition to endothelial binding at the glycocalyx, there is uptake of both CCL5 and CCL2 into the mouse brain parenchyma. We found no significant difference in the rate of chemokine uptake in mice treated with LPS versus untreated mice. However, the 125 I counts per minute (CPM) was significantly higher in the brains of LPS mice versus untreated mice brains, indicating that more radio‐labelled chemokine had entered the brain after LPS‐induced inflammation. In conclusion, we have found that chemokines interact with the intact BBB, and alterations in theses interactions with inflammation can be detected in vivo. As a future direction, this method can be utilized to evaluate pharmacological approaches to inhibiting BBB/chemokine interactions, which may protect against harmful neuroinflammation during neurological disease.

Key concepts: CCL5, Chemokine, Neuroinflammation, Blood–brain barrier, In vivo, Chemistry, Lipopolysaccharide, Cell biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transport of the Chemokines CCL5 and CCL2 Across the Mouse Blood‐Brain Barrier under Physiological and Inflammatory Conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens