2015National Bureau of Economic ResearchOpen access

Early Childhood Education

Sneha Elango, Jorge Luis García, James D. Heckman, Andrés Hojman

Open full text 80 citations

Abstract

This paper organizes and synthesizes the literature on early childhood education and childcare.In it, we go beyond meta-analysis and reanalyze primary data sources in a common framework.We consider the evidence from means-tested demonstration programs, large-scale means-tested programs and universal programs without means testing.We discuss which programs are beneficial and whether they are cost-effective for certain populations.The evidence from high-quality demonstration programs targeted toward disadvantaged children shows beneficial effects.Returns exceed costs, even accounting for the deadweight loss of collecting taxes.When proper policy counterfactuals are constructed, Head Start has beneficial effects on disadvantaged children compared to home alternatives.Universal programs benefit disadvantaged children.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper organizes and synthesizes the literature on early childhood education and childcare.In it, we go beyond meta-analysis and reanalyze primary data sources in a common framework.We consider the evidence from means-tested demonstration programs, large-scale means-tested programs and universal programs without means testing.We discuss which programs are beneficial and whether they are cost-effective for certain populations.The evidence from high-quality demonstration programs targeted toward disadvantaged children shows beneficial effects.Returns exceed costs, even accounting for the deadweight loss of collecting taxes.When proper policy counterfactuals are constructed, Head Start has beneficial effects on disadvantaged children compared to home alternatives.Universal programs benefit disadvantaged children.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 80 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper organizes and synthesizes the literature on early childhood education and childcare.In it, we go beyond meta-analysis and reanalyze primary data sources in a common framework.We consider the evidence from means-tested demonstration programs, large-scale means-tested programs and universal programs without means testing.We discuss which programs are beneficial and whether they are cost-effective for certain populations.The evidence from high-quality demonstration programs targeted toward disadvantaged children shows beneficial effects.Returns exceed costs, even accounting for the deadweight loss of collecting taxes.When proper policy counterfactuals are constructed, Head Start has beneficial effects on disadvantaged children compared to home alternatives.Universal programs benefit disadvantaged children.

Key concepts: Disadvantaged, Head start, Public economics, Counterfactual conditional, Early childhood, Quality (philosophy), Early childhood education, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Early Childhood Education — Research Paper | ScholarLens