2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

Life-Cycle Cost-Benefit Analysis

Charles A. Job

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The evaluation of costs and benefits in a structured approach provides significant information to develop business and government policy and assist in making decisions. A theoretically-sound, thorough, consistent, well-documented and science-based approach to cost-benefit analysis over a project’s or program’s expected duration or life cycle can address concerns about completeness or adequacy in its application as well as identify research needs on unquantified and unmonetized costs and benefits. A life-cycle assessment of a water well would start with the energy and emissions associated with extracting iron from ore or distillate chemicals from carbon fuels. Life-cycle cost analysis was introduced in the United States in 1960 for improvement of cost effectiveness of systems in the private sector. Several evaluation methods have been used to examine the economic effects of groundwater quality issues: impact analysis, life-cycle costing, cost-effectiveness evaluation and cost–benefit evaluation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The evaluation of costs and benefits in a structured approach provides significant information to develop business and government policy and assist in making decisions. A theoretically-sound, thorough, consistent, well-documented and science-based approach to cost-benefit analysis over a project’s or program’s expected duration or life cycle can address concerns about completeness or adequacy in its application as well as identify research needs on unquantified and unmonetized costs and benefits. A life-cycle assessment of a water well would start with the energy and emissions associated with extracting iron from ore or distillate chemicals from carbon fuels. Life-cycle cost analysis was introduced in the United States in 1960 for improvement of cost effectiveness of systems in the private sector. Several evaluation methods have been used to examine the economic effects of groundwater quality issues: impact analysis, life-cycle costing, cost-effectiveness evaluation and cost–benefit evaluation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The evaluation of costs and benefits in a structured approach provides significant information to develop business and government policy and assist in making decisions. A theoretically-sound, thorough, consistent, well-documented and science-based approach to cost-benefit analysis over a project’s or program’s expected duration or life cycle can address concerns about completeness or adequacy in its application as well as identify research needs on unquantified and unmonetized costs and benefits. A life-cycle assessment of a water well would start with the energy and emissions associated with extracting iron from ore or distillate chemicals from carbon fuels. Life-cycle cost analysis was introduced in the United States in 1960 for improvement of cost effectiveness of systems in the private sector. Several evaluation methods have been used to examine the economic effects of groundwater quality issues: impact analysis, life-cycle costing, cost-effectiveness evaluation and cost–benefit evaluation.

Key concepts: Life-cycle cost analysis, Computer science, Business, Risk analysis (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Life-Cycle Cost-Benefit Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens