2021•Astronomy and AstrophysicsOpen access

Luminous efficiency of meteors derived from ablation model after assessment of its range of validity

Esther Drolshagen, Theresa Ott, D. Koschny, G. Drolshagen, Jérémie Vaubaillon, F. Colas, Brigitte Zanda, Sylvain Bouley, Simon Jeanne, Adrien Malgoyre, Mirel Birlan, Pierre Vernazza, D. Gardiol, Dan Alin Nedelcu, J. Rowe, M. Forcier, Josep Maria Trigo-Rodríguez, Eloy Peña‐Asensio, H. Lamy, L. Ferrière, D. Barghini, A. Carbognani, M. Di Martino, S. Rasetti, Giovanni Battista Valsecchi, A. Volpicelli, Matteo Di Carlo, C. Knapic, Giovanni Pratesi, Walter Riva, Giovanna Maria Stirpe, Sonia Zorba, Olivier Hernandez, A. Grandchamps, E. Jehin, Marie-Hélène Jobin, A. J. King, Agustín Sánchez-Lavega, Andrea De Toni, Albert Rimola, Björn Poppe

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

Context.The luminous efficiency,τ, can be used to compute the pre-atmospheric masses of meteoroids from corresponding recorded meteor brightnesses. The derivation of the luminous efficiency is non-trivial and is subject to biases and model assumptions. This has led to greatly varying results in the last decades of studies. Aims.The present paper aims to investigate how a reduction in various observational biases can be achieved to derive (more) reliable values for the luminous efficiency. Methods.A total of 281 meteors observed by the Fireball Recovery and InterPlanetary Observation Network (FRIPON) are studied. The luminous efficiencies of the events are computed using an ablation-based model. The relations ofτas a function of the pre-atmospheric meteoroid velocity,ve, and mass,Me, are studied. Various aspects that could render the method less valid, cause inaccuracies, or bias the results are investigated. On this basis, the best suitable meteors were selected for luminous efficiency computations. Results.The presented analysis shows the limits of the used method. The most influential characteristics that are necessary for reliable results for theτcomputation were identified. We study the dependence ofτon the assumed meteoroid’s density,ρ, and include improvedρ-values for objects with identified meteoroid stream association. Based on the discovered individual biases and constraints we create a pre-debiased subset of 54 well-recorded events with a relative velocity change >80%, a final height <70 km, and a Knudsen number Kn < 0.01; this last value indicates that the events were observed in the continuum-flow regime. We findτ-values in the range between 0.012% and 1.1% for this pre-debiased subset and relations ofτtoveandMeof:τ=7.33⋅ve−1.10andτ=0.28⋅Me−0.33. Conclusions.The derived luminous efficiency of meteoroids depends on the assumed material density. Our results indicate that the applied debiasing method improves the analysis ofτfrom decelerated meteoroids. The underlying method is only valid for meteors in the continuum-flow regime. These events tend to have low end heights, large masses, and high deceleration.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Context.The luminous efficiency,τ, can be used to compute the pre-atmospheric masses of meteoroids from corresponding recorded meteor brightnesses. The derivation of the luminous efficiency is non-trivial and is subject to biases and model assumptions. This has led to greatly varying results in the last decades of studies. Aims.The present paper aims to investigate how a reduction in various observational biases can be achieved to derive (more) reliable values for the luminous efficiency. Methods.A total of 281 meteors observed by the Fireball Recovery and InterPlanetary Observation Network (FRIPON) are studied. The luminous efficiencies of the events are computed using an ablation-based model. The relations ofτas a function of the pre-atmospheric meteoroid velocity,ve, and mass,Me, are studied. Various aspects that could render the method less valid, cause inaccuracies, or bias the results are investigated. On this basis, the best suitable meteors were selected for luminous efficiency computations. Results.The presented analysis shows the limits of the used method. The most influential characteristics that are necessary for reliable results for theτcomputation were identified. We study the dependence ofτon the assumed meteoroid’s density,ρ, and include improvedρ-values for objects with identified meteoroid stream association. Based on the discovered individual biases and constraints we create a pre-debiased subset of 54 well-recorded events with a relative velocity change >80%, a final height <70 km, and a Knudsen number Kn < 0.01; this last value indicates that the events were observed in the continuum-flow regime. We findτ-values in the range between 0.012% and 1.1% for this pre-debiased subset and relations ofτtoveandMeof:τ=7.33⋅ve−1.10andτ=0.28⋅Me−0.33. Conclusions.The derived luminous efficiency of meteoroids depends on the assumed material density. Our results indicate that the applied debiasing method improves the analysis ofτfrom decelerated meteoroids. The underlying method is only valid for meteors in the continuum-flow regime. These events tend to have low end heights, large masses, and high deceleration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Context.The luminous efficiency,τ, can be used to compute the pre-atmospheric masses of meteoroids from corresponding recorded meteor brightnesses. The derivation of the luminous efficiency is non-trivial and is subject to biases and model assumptions. This has led to greatly varying results in the last decades of studies. Aims.The present paper aims to investigate how a reduction in various observational biases can be achieved to derive (more) reliable values for the luminous efficiency. Methods.A total of 281 meteors observed by the Fireball Recovery and InterPlanetary Observation Network (FRIPON) are studied. The luminous efficiencies of the events are computed using an ablation-based model. The relations ofτas a function of the pre-atmospheric meteoroid velocity,ve, and mass,Me, are studied. Various aspects that could render the method less valid, cause inaccuracies, or bias the results are investigated. On this basis, the best suitable meteors were selected for luminous efficiency computations. Results.The presented analysis shows the limits of the used method. The most influential characteristics that are necessary for reliable results for theτcomputation were identified. We study the dependence ofτon the assumed meteoroid’s density,ρ, and include improvedρ-values for objects with identified meteoroid stream association. Based on the discovered individual biases and constraints we create a pre-debiased subset of 54 well-recorded events with a relative velocity change >80%, a final height <70 km, and a Knudsen number Kn < 0.01; this last value indicates that the events were observed in the continuum-flow regime. We findτ-values in the range between 0.012% and 1.1% for this pre-debiased subset and relations ofτtoveandMeof:τ=7.33⋅ve−1.10andτ=0.28⋅Me−0.33. Conclusions.The derived luminous efficiency of meteoroids depends on the assumed material density. Our results indicate that the applied debiasing method improves the analysis ofτfrom decelerated meteoroids. The underlying method is only valid for meteors in the continuum-flow regime. These events tend to have low end heights, large masses, and high deceleration.

Key concepts: Meteoroid, Luminous efficacy, Meteor (satellite), Physics, Context (archaeology), Range (aeronautics), Astrophysics, Astronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Luminous efficiency of meteors derived from ablation model after assessment of its range of validity — Research Paper | ScholarLens