2005Encyclopedia of BiostatisticsRequires access

Bias in Case–Control Studies

Samuel Shapiro, Lynn Rosenberg

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Abstract We discuss two classes of bias that arise in case–control studies, selection bias and information bias. A third source of bias, confounding, is not considered in this article. Selection bias arises either when cases in the study sample are not representative of cases arising from the source population (“study base”) or when controls are not representative of corresponding noncases in the study base. Sources of selection bias include bias in identifying cases or noncases in the study base, nonrepresentative sampling techniques, and selective refusal to participate (nonresponse bias). Use of nonrepresentative controls, such as hospital‐based controls, can lead to bias if the exposure distribution differs from that of controls in the study base. Information bias arises from inaccurate reporting of exposures and other covariates by cases or controls, and can result in serious distortion of estimated odds ratios when the errors in reporting by cases and controls are differential (recall bias).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract We discuss two classes of bias that arise in case–control studies, selection bias and information bias. A third source of bias, confounding, is not considered in this article. Selection bias arises either when cases in the study sample are not representative of cases arising from the source population (“study base”) or when controls are not representative of corresponding noncases in the study base. Sources of selection bias include bias in identifying cases or noncases in the study base, nonrepresentative sampling techniques, and selective refusal to participate (nonresponse bias). Use of nonrepresentative controls, such as hospital‐based controls, can lead to bias if the exposure distribution differs from that of controls in the study base. Information bias arises from inaccurate reporting of exposures and other covariates by cases or controls, and can result in serious distortion of estimated odds ratios when the errors in reporting by cases and controls are differential (recall bias).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract We discuss two classes of bias that arise in case–control studies, selection bias and information bias. A third source of bias, confounding, is not considered in this article. Selection bias arises either when cases in the study sample are not representative of cases arising from the source population (“study base”) or when controls are not representative of corresponding noncases in the study base. Sources of selection bias include bias in identifying cases or noncases in the study base, nonrepresentative sampling techniques, and selective refusal to participate (nonresponse bias). Use of nonrepresentative controls, such as hospital‐based controls, can lead to bias if the exposure distribution differs from that of controls in the study base. Information bias arises from inaccurate reporting of exposures and other covariates by cases or controls, and can result in serious distortion of estimated odds ratios when the errors in reporting by cases and controls are differential (recall bias).

Key concepts: Information bias, Selection bias, Sampling bias, Confounding, Recall bias, Non-response bias, Statistics, Reporting bias

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bias in Case–Control Studies — Research Paper | ScholarLens