2011•African Population StudiesOpen access

Fistulectomy and anoplasty for low imperforate anus with anoperineal fistula in boys

IA Ibrahim

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose To present our operative technique for the treatment of anoperineal fistula, discussing its advantages in comparison with other methods of treatment. Patients and methods This study included 35 neonate boys, 34 were full term and one was preterm. Their age ranged from 1 to 4 days, and they were diagnosed to have low imperforate anus with anoperineal fistula, without associated major anomalies. They were treated by fistulectomy and anoplasty. Results The operative time ranged from 25 to 40 min. The operation was completed successfully in all patients. All patients started gradual oral feeding 2 h postoperatively and were discharged after 24–48 h on oral feeding. Postoperative stricture occurred in two patients, one responded to dilation and the other needed redo surgery by a simple cutback technique. Continence could be assessed in 23 patients whose follow-up periods were longer than 3 years. Twenty-one patients had a good score and two had a fair score. No patients had a poor score. Conclusion Our approach has the following advantages: (i) the operation is simple and easy to perform. (ii) It has a minimal complication rate, with a good cosmetic and functional outcome. (iii) Anorectal function was not adversely affected in patients with anterior position of the anal orifice.Keywords: anorectal anomalies, anoperineal fistula, low imperforate anus

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose To present our operative technique for the treatment of anoperineal fistula, discussing its advantages in comparison with other methods of treatment. Patients and methods This study included 35 neonate boys, 34 were full term and one was preterm. Their age ranged from 1 to 4 days, and they were diagnosed to have low imperforate anus with anoperineal fistula, without associated major anomalies. They were treated by fistulectomy and anoplasty. Results The operative time ranged from 25 to 40 min. The operation was completed successfully in all patients. All patients started gradual oral feeding 2 h postoperatively and were discharged after 24–48 h on oral feeding. Postoperative stricture occurred in two patients, one responded to dilation and the other needed redo surgery by a simple cutback technique. Continence could be assessed in 23 patients whose follow-up periods were longer than 3 years. Twenty-one patients had a good score and two had a fair score. No patients had a poor score. Conclusion Our approach has the following advantages: (i) the operation is simple and easy to perform. (ii) It has a minimal complication rate, with a good cosmetic and functional outcome. (iii) Anorectal function was not adversely affected in patients with anterior position of the anal orifice.Keywords: anorectal anomalies, anoperineal fistula, low imperforate anus

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose To present our operative technique for the treatment of anoperineal fistula, discussing its advantages in comparison with other methods of treatment. Patients and methods This study included 35 neonate boys, 34 were full term and one was preterm. Their age ranged from 1 to 4 days, and they were diagnosed to have low imperforate anus with anoperineal fistula, without associated major anomalies. They were treated by fistulectomy and anoplasty. Results The operative time ranged from 25 to 40 min. The operation was completed successfully in all patients. All patients started gradual oral feeding 2 h postoperatively and were discharged after 24–48 h on oral feeding. Postoperative stricture occurred in two patients, one responded to dilation and the other needed redo surgery by a simple cutback technique. Continence could be assessed in 23 patients whose follow-up periods were longer than 3 years. Twenty-one patients had a good score and two had a fair score. No patients had a poor score. Conclusion Our approach has the following advantages: (i) the operation is simple and easy to perform. (ii) It has a minimal complication rate, with a good cosmetic and functional outcome. (iii) Anorectal function was not adversely affected in patients with anterior position of the anal orifice.Keywords: anorectal anomalies, anoperineal fistula, low imperforate anus

Key concepts: Imperforate anus, Fistulectomy, Medicine, Surgery, Fistula, Anus, Anorectal anomalies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fistulectomy and anoplasty for low imperforate anus with anoperineal fistula in boys — Research Paper | ScholarLens