The UN Security Council Resolution 2231 & Withdrawal of the USA from JCPOA; from Supremacy of the Art. 103 UN Charter up to Diminishing Its Dignity
Seyyed Ghasem Zamani, Masoud ُSabour
Abstract
Seyyed Ghasem Zamani, Masoud ُSabour
Abstract
In mid-2018, the President of the United States announced the withdrawal of his government from the nuclear agreement also known as Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). This document was signed in 2015 by the efforts of the Iranian government, permanent members of the Security Council, Germany and the European Union. Shortly after the conclusion of the deal, it was annexed to the binding Security Council Resolution 2231. This study, by resort to the implementing potency of Article 25 of the United Nations Charter and its reflection in Article 103 of the same document which declares the priority of obligations under the Charter over other obligations, and also after identification of the executive and binding character of United Nations Security Council through the interpretation methods reflected in Articles 31 and 32 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, seeks to indicate the ignorance and violations by the United States and other states of the thematic and binding resolutions of the Security Council in the past decades, as a strong reason for the descension of credit and validity of Article 103 of the United Nations Charter.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In mid-2018, the President of the United States announced the withdrawal of his government from the nuclear agreement also known as Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). This document was signed in 2015 by the efforts of the Iranian government, permanent members of the Security Council, Germany and the European Union. Shortly after the conclusion of the deal, it was annexed to the binding Security Council Resolution 2231. This study, by resort to the implementing potency of Article 25 of the United Nations Charter and its reflection in Article 103 of the same document which declares the priority of obligations under the Charter over other obligations, and also after identification of the executive and binding character of United Nations Security Council through the interpretation methods reflected in Articles 31 and 32 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, seeks to indicate the ignorance and violations by the United States and other states of the thematic and binding resolutions of the Security Council in the past decades, as a strong reason for the descension of credit and validity of Article 103 of the United Nations Charter.
Key concepts: Charter, Political science, Law, Public administration, Government (linguistics), United Nations Charter, Ignorance, Security council