2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Effect of pH on hematoxylin and eosin staining of rats intestinal tissue

Hazulin Mohd Radzuan, Wan Fatein Nabeila Wan Omar, Mohd Dhiyaulhaq Halim

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Optimising hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) protocol does not only ensure reproducible and excellent staining quality, it also helps to optimise the use of lab materials and resources. This study investigates the effect of hematoxylin pH on H&E staining quality. Method: In an experimental study, 3 μm tissue sections of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded intestinal tissues of three healthy female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to the standard H&E protocol. Modified Gill’s hematoxylins of four pH (2.5, 2.75, 3.0 and 3.5) and eosin (pH 5.0) as counterstain were used. Results: At hematoxypin pH 2.5, the tissues appeared acidophilic with indistinctive epithelial lining. At pH 2.75, the hematoxylin dye was most prominent with good balance of staining, and crisp epithelial lining was observed. At pH 3.0 or higher, although the lining was crisp, blue-staining mucin were observed. Conclusion: pH 2.74 is the most optimal pH to achieve balance of coloration and definitive epithelial lining in H&E staining.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Optimising hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) protocol does not only ensure reproducible and excellent staining quality, it also helps to optimise the use of lab materials and resources. This study investigates the effect of hematoxylin pH on H&E staining quality. Method: In an experimental study, 3 μm tissue sections of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded intestinal tissues of three healthy female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to the standard H&E protocol. Modified Gill’s hematoxylins of four pH (2.5, 2.75, 3.0 and 3.5) and eosin (pH 5.0) as counterstain were used. Results: At hematoxypin pH 2.5, the tissues appeared acidophilic with indistinctive epithelial lining. At pH 2.75, the hematoxylin dye was most prominent with good balance of staining, and crisp epithelial lining was observed. At pH 3.0 or higher, although the lining was crisp, blue-staining mucin were observed. Conclusion: pH 2.74 is the most optimal pH to achieve balance of coloration and definitive epithelial lining in H&E staining.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Optimising hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) protocol does not only ensure reproducible and excellent staining quality, it also helps to optimise the use of lab materials and resources. This study investigates the effect of hematoxylin pH on H&E staining quality. Method: In an experimental study, 3 μm tissue sections of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded intestinal tissues of three healthy female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to the standard H&E protocol. Modified Gill’s hematoxylins of four pH (2.5, 2.75, 3.0 and 3.5) and eosin (pH 5.0) as counterstain were used. Results: At hematoxypin pH 2.5, the tissues appeared acidophilic with indistinctive epithelial lining. At pH 2.75, the hematoxylin dye was most prominent with good balance of staining, and crisp epithelial lining was observed. At pH 3.0 or higher, although the lining was crisp, blue-staining mucin were observed. Conclusion: pH 2.74 is the most optimal pH to achieve balance of coloration and definitive epithelial lining in H&E staining.

Key concepts: H&E stain, Staining, Eosin, Chemistry, Eosin Y, Pathology, Medicine, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of pH on hematoxylin and eosin staining of rats intestinal tissue — Research Paper | ScholarLens