2007•스칸디나비아 연구Requires access

스웨덴 사회적 협의체제의 변화

신동면

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the change of social concertation system in Sweden since 1992 when the lekmannastyresler that had made both labour and business representatives participate in the policy making process in the central government was formally abrogated. It also discusses the reason why the social concertation has been revived focusing on the strategical choices of the actors who take part in the social dialogue. Though the institution of social corporatism in the national level was repealed in Sweden, the social concertation has been vital in the sectoral level for the mutual agreement between labour and business. The revival of supply oriented corporatism/competitive corporatism in the national level illustrates that the Swedish model of social consensus is not abolished but changed to adopt the economic environment. The interests of the actors who participate in the social dialogue in the national level have evolved. LO(Labour Organization) has steadily propelled the revival of social concertation to bring her power of representation among labour forces back. CS E (Confederation of Swedish Enterprise) was against the social partnership and tried to strengthen her power mainly by employing pluralistic politics as well as political network with conservative party. However, CSE has been active recently in establishing supply oriented corporatism in the national level arguing the reduction of corporation tax, the increase of education and research investment, the reform of labour related laws for the labour flexibility and so on. The change of actors’ interests has put social concertation in the national level into effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines the change of social concertation system in Sweden since 1992 when the lekmannastyresler that had made both labour and business representatives participate in the policy making process in the central government was formally abrogated. It also discusses the reason why the social concertation has been revived focusing on the strategical choices of the actors who take part in the social dialogue. Though the institution of social corporatism in the national level was repealed in Sweden, the social concertation has been vital in the sectoral level for the mutual agreement between labour and business. The revival of supply oriented corporatism/competitive corporatism in the national level illustrates that the Swedish model of social consensus is not abolished but changed to adopt the economic environment. The interests of the actors who participate in the social dialogue in the national level have evolved. LO(Labour Organization) has steadily propelled the revival of social concertation to bring her power of representation among labour forces back. CS E (Confederation of Swedish Enterprise) was against the social partnership and tried to strengthen her power mainly by employing pluralistic politics as well as political network with conservative party. However, CSE has been active recently in establishing supply oriented corporatism in the national level arguing the reduction of corporation tax, the increase of education and research investment, the reform of labour related laws for the labour flexibility and so on. The change of actors’ interests has put social concertation in the national level into effect.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines the change of social concertation system in Sweden since 1992 when the lekmannastyresler that had made both labour and business representatives participate in the policy making process in the central government was formally abrogated. It also discusses the reason why the social concertation has been revived focusing on the strategical choices of the actors who take part in the social dialogue. Though the institution of social corporatism in the national level was repealed in Sweden, the social concertation has been vital in the sectoral level for the mutual agreement between labour and business. The revival of supply oriented corporatism/competitive corporatism in the national level illustrates that the Swedish model of social consensus is not abolished but changed to adopt the economic environment. The interests of the actors who participate in the social dialogue in the national level have evolved. LO(Labour Organization) has steadily propelled the revival of social concertation to bring her power of representation among labour forces back. CS E (Confederation of Swedish Enterprise) was against the social partnership and tried to strengthen her power mainly by employing pluralistic politics as well as political network with conservative party. However, CSE has been active recently in establishing supply oriented corporatism in the national level arguing the reduction of corporation tax, the increase of education and research investment, the reform of labour related laws for the labour flexibility and so on. The change of actors’ interests has put social concertation in the national level into effect.

Key concepts: Corporatism, Social partners, Social Partnership, Social dialogue, Corporation, Politics, Government (linguistics), Public administration

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
스웨덴 사회적 협의체제의 변화 — Research Paper | ScholarLens