ScholarLens Back to search
2020•OAR@UM (University of Malta)Open access

Global constitutional law

Laura Aquilina

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In this article, the author tackles two different legal aspects of the developing area of Global Constitutional law. The first essay draws a comparison between the varying theories and opinions of two authors in the field; Dieter Grimm and Mattias Kumm. The work of these two authors is outlined and compared. The second essay deals with the way in which a US Supreme Court judgment (Roper vs. Simmons) addresses a problematic facet of Global Constitutional Law. The case itself is outlined, along with its dissenting opinions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, the author tackles two different legal aspects of the developing area of Global Constitutional law. The first essay draws a comparison between the varying theories and opinions of two authors in the field; Dieter Grimm and Mattias Kumm. The work of these two authors is outlined and compared. The second essay deals with the way in which a US Supreme Court judgment (Roper vs. Simmons) addresses a problematic facet of Global Constitutional Law. The case itself is outlined, along with its dissenting opinions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, the author tackles two different legal aspects of the developing area of Global Constitutional law. The first essay draws a comparison between the varying theories and opinions of two authors in the field; Dieter Grimm and Mattias Kumm. The work of these two authors is outlined and compared. The second essay deals with the way in which a US Supreme Court judgment (Roper vs. Simmons) addresses a problematic facet of Global Constitutional Law. The case itself is outlined, along with its dissenting opinions.

Key concepts: Law, Political science

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Global constitutional law — Research Paper | ScholarLens