2015•Transportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Road-Surface Contrast and Adaptation of Visibility of Low-Contrast Targets

Travis N. Terry, Ronald B. Gibbons

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the visibility of low-contrast small targets on a roadway illuminated with light-emitting diode (LED) lighting. Detection-distance measurements were taken on two pavement types, with multiple roadway-lighting illuminance levels, and with and without headlamps. Contrast, vertical illuminance, and visibility levels were also measured and/or calculated. Results showed that the uniformity of the pavement affected mean detection distance. Concrete pavement had less luminance uniformity and longer mean detection distances, while asphalt pavement had more luminance uniformity and shorter detection distances. When headlamps were on, mean detection distances were shorter, possibly because headlamps create a brighter environment to which the eye adapts, lowering its sensitivity to low-contrast objects. When the vehicle was close to the target, the headlamp light could drown out the contrast between the target and background, making it difficult to detect. In general, the brighter the LED roadway lighting, the longer the detection distances, but the results were not significant in three out of four experimental conditions. Visibility level, calculated using Weber contrast and a number of other factors, did not accurately predict the mean detection distance for two experimental conditions. Those calculations might not fully describe small-target visibility for all roadway conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study investigated the visibility of low-contrast small targets on a roadway illuminated with light-emitting diode (LED) lighting. Detection-distance measurements were taken on two pavement types, with multiple roadway-lighting illuminance levels, and with and without headlamps. Contrast, vertical illuminance, and visibility levels were also measured and/or calculated. Results showed that the uniformity of the pavement affected mean detection distance. Concrete pavement had less luminance uniformity and longer mean detection distances, while asphalt pavement had more luminance uniformity and shorter detection distances. When headlamps were on, mean detection distances were shorter, possibly because headlamps create a brighter environment to which the eye adapts, lowering its sensitivity to low-contrast objects. When the vehicle was close to the target, the headlamp light could drown out the contrast between the target and background, making it difficult to detect. In general, the brighter the LED roadway lighting, the longer the detection distances, but the results were not significant in three out of four experimental conditions. Visibility level, calculated using Weber contrast and a number of other factors, did not accurately predict the mean detection distance for two experimental conditions. Those calculations might not fully describe small-target visibility for all roadway conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study investigated the visibility of low-contrast small targets on a roadway illuminated with light-emitting diode (LED) lighting. Detection-distance measurements were taken on two pavement types, with multiple roadway-lighting illuminance levels, and with and without headlamps. Contrast, vertical illuminance, and visibility levels were also measured and/or calculated. Results showed that the uniformity of the pavement affected mean detection distance. Concrete pavement had less luminance uniformity and longer mean detection distances, while asphalt pavement had more luminance uniformity and shorter detection distances. When headlamps were on, mean detection distances were shorter, possibly because headlamps create a brighter environment to which the eye adapts, lowering its sensitivity to low-contrast objects. When the vehicle was close to the target, the headlamp light could drown out the contrast between the target and background, making it difficult to detect. In general, the brighter the LED roadway lighting, the longer the detection distances, but the results were not significant in three out of four experimental conditions. Visibility level, calculated using Weber contrast and a number of other factors, did not accurately predict the mean detection distance for two experimental conditions. Those calculations might not fully describe small-target visibility for all roadway conditions.

Key concepts: Visibility, Luminance, Headlamp, Contrast (vision), Illuminance, Optics, Retroreflector, GLARE

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Road-Surface Contrast and Adaptation of Visibility of Low-Contrast Targets — Research Paper | ScholarLens