2007Deeds and DaysOpen access

Filosofiniai žurnalistikos pagrindai : subjektyviosios objektyvumo šaknys

Mykolas-Jurgis Drunga

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Journalism, like science, takes for granted certain fundamental assumptions, including (1) that reality exists; (2) that truths exist; and (3) that reality can be shown by expressing truths about it. These assumptions have been challenged by relativists and postmodernists of various stripes. This paper attempts to overcome the challenge by showing that these assumptions can be vigorously de¬fended (and some kinds of relativism and postmodernism refuted) not only on Aristotelian-Tho-mistic but also on Berkleian (subjective idealist) and Kantian (transcendental idealist, humankind-relativist) grounds. If the latter two approaches can be sustained, then objectivity and subjectivity need not be considered mutually exclusive. This paper is part of a larger project of exploring the foundations of journalistic objectivity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Journalism, like science, takes for granted certain fundamental assumptions, including (1) that reality exists; (2) that truths exist; and (3) that reality can be shown by expressing truths about it. These assumptions have been challenged by relativists and postmodernists of various stripes. This paper attempts to overcome the challenge by showing that these assumptions can be vigorously de¬fended (and some kinds of relativism and postmodernism refuted) not only on Aristotelian-Tho-mistic but also on Berkleian (subjective idealist) and Kantian (transcendental idealist, humankind-relativist) grounds. If the latter two approaches can be sustained, then objectivity and subjectivity need not be considered mutually exclusive. This paper is part of a larger project of exploring the foundations of journalistic objectivity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Journalism, like science, takes for granted certain fundamental assumptions, including (1) that reality exists; (2) that truths exist; and (3) that reality can be shown by expressing truths about it. These assumptions have been challenged by relativists and postmodernists of various stripes. This paper attempts to overcome the challenge by showing that these assumptions can be vigorously de¬fended (and some kinds of relativism and postmodernism refuted) not only on Aristotelian-Tho-mistic but also on Berkleian (subjective idealist) and Kantian (transcendental idealist, humankind-relativist) grounds. If the latter two approaches can be sustained, then objectivity and subjectivity need not be considered mutually exclusive. This paper is part of a larger project of exploring the foundations of journalistic objectivity.

Key concepts: Relativism, Objectivity (philosophy), Subjectivity, Epistemology, Philosophy, Transcendental number, Postmodernism, Journalism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Filosofiniai žurnalistikos pagrindai : subjektyviosios objektyvumo šaknys — Research Paper | ScholarLens