2020•Kansas Law ReviewOpen access

,,,Getting It Right Isn’t Enough: The Appellate Court’s Role in Procedural Justice

Steve Leben

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Extensive research has shown that adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of an authority’s legitimacy. In courts, adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to greater compliance with court orders, greater cooperation with courts, and higher overall approval for the court system. This Article applies the lessons of procedural justice to the appellate courts.The Article first reviews public-opinion data about the courts, finding that a generally diminished trust in institutions includes the courts. The Article then reviews the research showing that the application of procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of court legitimacy. From that basis, the Article recommends several steps appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court, should take to improve perceptions of fairness.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Extensive research has shown that adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of an authority’s legitimacy. In courts, adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to greater compliance with court orders, greater cooperation with courts, and higher overall approval for the court system. This Article applies the lessons of procedural justice to the appellate courts.The Article first reviews public-opinion data about the courts, finding that a generally diminished trust in institutions includes the courts. The Article then reviews the research showing that the application of procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of court legitimacy. From that basis, the Article recommends several steps appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court, should take to improve perceptions of fairness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Extensive research has shown that adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of an authority’s legitimacy. In courts, adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to greater compliance with court orders, greater cooperation with courts, and higher overall approval for the court system. This Article applies the lessons of procedural justice to the appellate courts.The Article first reviews public-opinion data about the courts, finding that a generally diminished trust in institutions includes the courts. The Article then reviews the research showing that the application of procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of court legitimacy. From that basis, the Article recommends several steps appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court, should take to improve perceptions of fairness.

Key concepts: Political science, Economic Justice, Remand (court procedure), Law, Law and economics, Psychology, Supreme court, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
,,,Getting It Right Isn’t Enough: The Appellate Court’s Role in Procedural Justice — Research Paper | ScholarLens