Optimal Correction of Adult Spinal Deformities Requires Restoration of Distal Lumbar Lordosis
Sébastien Pesenti, Solène Prost, Andrés Muñoz McCausland, Kaissar Farah, Patrick Tropiano, S. Fuentès, Benjamin Blondel
Abstract
Open-access reader
Sébastien Pesenti, Solène Prost, Andrés Muñoz McCausland, Kaissar Farah, Patrick Tropiano, S. Fuentès, Benjamin Blondel
Abstract
Open-access reader
Purpose. The aim of this study is to analyze results according to postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch in the management of adult spine deformity (ASD) patients. Recently, it has been reported that in addition to lumbar lordosis amount, lordosis repartition between its proximal and distal parts was crucial. Methods. We enrolled 77 consecutive ASD patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion and deformity correction between 2015 and 2018. On preoperative and 1-year follow-up radiographs, we analyzed different parameters such as L1-S1 lumbar lordosis, L1-L4 proximal lordosis (PLL), L4-S1 distal lordosis (DLL), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and PI-LL mismatch. Comparisons were performed according to postoperative PI-LL mismatch (defined as “aligned” when PI-LL was <10°). The relationship between lordosis distribution and postoperative alignment status was investigated. Results. On the whole series, average lumbar lordosis, SVA, and PI-LL improved (28.2° vs.43.5°, 82 vs. 51 mm, and 26°vs. 14°, all p < 0.001 , respectively). On the other hand, PT remained unchanged (30° vs. 28°, p > 0.05 ). 35 patients were classified as “aligned” and 42 as “not aligned.” Patients from the “aligned” group had a significantly lower PI than patients from the “not aligned” group (52° vs. 61°, p = 0.009 ). Postoperative PLL was not different between groups (18° vs. 16° p > 0.05 ), whereas DLL was significantly higher in the “aligned” group (31° vs. 22°, p = 0.003 ). PI-LL was significantly correlated to DLL (rho = 0.407, p < 0.001 ) but not with PLL (rho = 0.110, p = 0.342 ). Conclusions. Our results revealed that in ASD patients, postoperative malalignment was associated with a lack of DLL restoration. “Not aligned” patients had also a significantly higher pelvic incidence. Specific attention must be paid to restore optimal distal lumbar lordosis in order to set the amount and the distribution of optimal postoperative lumbar lordosis.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose. The aim of this study is to analyze results according to postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch in the management of adult spine deformity (ASD) patients. Recently, it has been reported that in addition to lumbar lordosis amount, lordosis repartition between its proximal and distal parts was crucial. Methods. We enrolled 77 consecutive ASD patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion and deformity correction between 2015 and 2018. On preoperative and 1-year follow-up radiographs, we analyzed different parameters such as L1-S1 lumbar lordosis, L1-L4 proximal lordosis (PLL), L4-S1 distal lordosis (DLL), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and PI-LL mismatch. Comparisons were performed according to postoperative PI-LL mismatch (defined as “aligned” when PI-LL was <10°). The relationship between lordosis distribution and postoperative alignment status was investigated. Results. On the whole series, average lumbar lordosis, SVA, and PI-LL improved (28.2° vs.43.5°, 82 vs. 51 mm, and 26°vs. 14°, all p < 0.001 , respectively). On the other hand, PT remained unchanged (30° vs. 28°, p > 0.05 ). 35 patients were classified as “aligned” and 42 as “not aligned.” Patients from the “aligned” group had a significantly lower PI than patients from the “not aligned” group (52° vs. 61°, p = 0.009 ). Postoperative PLL was not different between groups (18° vs. 16° p > 0.05 ), whereas DLL was significantly higher in the “aligned” group (31° vs. 22°, p = 0.003 ). PI-LL was significantly correlated to DLL (rho = 0.407, p < 0.001 ) but not with PLL (rho = 0.110, p = 0.342 ). Conclusions. Our results revealed that in ASD patients, postoperative malalignment was associated with a lack of DLL restoration. “Not aligned” patients had also a significantly higher pelvic incidence. Specific attention must be paid to restore optimal distal lumbar lordosis in order to set the amount and the distribution of optimal postoperative lumbar lordosis.
Key concepts: Medicine, Lordosis, Lumbar lordosis, Pelvic tilt, Spinal deformity, Sagittal plane, Lumbar, Deformity