2020RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

The representativeness of Understanding Society

Michaela Benzeval, Christopher R. Bollinger, Jonathan W. Burton, Thomas F. Crossley, Peter Lynn

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

In this paper we have defined “representativeness†in terms of the ability to support overall population inferences and subpopulation inferences, associations and causal relationships at the same time. We have note some challenges that need to be balanced to achieve this, for example between population coverage and precision and between cross-sectional and longitudinal populations of interest. We next offer some comments on how representativeness should be assessed. Subsequent sections review existing and new evidence on the representativeness of Understanding Society in these two dimensions. We then conclude by discussing current and planned initiatives to enhance the representativeness of Understanding Society.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper we have defined “representativeness†in terms of the ability to support overall population inferences and subpopulation inferences, associations and causal relationships at the same time. We have note some challenges that need to be balanced to achieve this, for example between population coverage and precision and between cross-sectional and longitudinal populations of interest. We next offer some comments on how representativeness should be assessed. Subsequent sections review existing and new evidence on the representativeness of Understanding Society in these two dimensions. We then conclude by discussing current and planned initiatives to enhance the representativeness of Understanding Society.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper we have defined “representativeness†in terms of the ability to support overall population inferences and subpopulation inferences, associations and causal relationships at the same time. We have note some challenges that need to be balanced to achieve this, for example between population coverage and precision and between cross-sectional and longitudinal populations of interest. We next offer some comments on how representativeness should be assessed. Subsequent sections review existing and new evidence on the representativeness of Understanding Society in these two dimensions. We then conclude by discussing current and planned initiatives to enhance the representativeness of Understanding Society.

Key concepts: Representativeness heuristic, Population, Causal inference, Data science, Management science, Political science, Computer science, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The representativeness of Understanding Society — Research Paper | ScholarLens