2021•eYLS (Yale Law School)Open access

Personal Jurisdiction, Comparativism, and Ford

Scott Dodson

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The March 2021 decision of Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District completes the triangulation of specific personal jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution. Combined with the Court’s recent narrowing of general jurisdiction and the Court’s longstanding adherence to tag jurisdiction and consent-based jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction in the United States is developing contours that are more defined and concrete. What does this state of personal jurisdiction mean for future developments? And how does it compare to the way other countries have structured personal jurisdiction? This symposium essay offers answers to those questions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The March 2021 decision of Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District completes the triangulation of specific personal jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution. Combined with the Court’s recent narrowing of general jurisdiction and the Court’s longstanding adherence to tag jurisdiction and consent-based jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction in the United States is developing contours that are more defined and concrete. What does this state of personal jurisdiction mean for future developments? And how does it compare to the way other countries have structured personal jurisdiction? This symposium essay offers answers to those questions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The March 2021 decision of Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District completes the triangulation of specific personal jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution. Combined with the Court’s recent narrowing of general jurisdiction and the Court’s longstanding adherence to tag jurisdiction and consent-based jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction in the United States is developing contours that are more defined and concrete. What does this state of personal jurisdiction mean for future developments? And how does it compare to the way other countries have structured personal jurisdiction? This symposium essay offers answers to those questions.

Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Personal jurisdiction, Original jurisdiction, Law, Political science, State (computer science), Subject-matter jurisdiction, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Personal Jurisdiction, Comparativism, and Ford — Research Paper | ScholarLens