2021Polish Journal of SurgeryRequires access

WHY DIAGNOSTIC LAPAROSCOPY

Necattin Fırat, Barış Mantoğlu, Emrah Akın, Enes Baş, Fatih Altıntoprak

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal pain requires rapid diagnosis and treatment, especially in emergency circumstances. Sometimes the diagnosis of the disease cannot be accomplished with laboratory and imaging methods, and an invasive procedure such as diagnostic laparoscopy may be required to obtain a diagnosis. Diagnostic laparoscopy is also performed therapeutically, but laparotomy is inevitable in some cases. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment and to retrospectively examine the factors that force the surgeon to perform a laparotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients over the age of 18 who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy in the general surgery clinic of Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients under 18 years of age and patients diagnosed before surgery were excluded. Demographic data of the patients, whether there was a conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy, postoperative morbidity, and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: The data of 347 patients in total were evaluated retrospectively between the specified dates. 216 of the patients were previously diagnosed, laparoscopic procedures performed for staging purposes and they were not included in the study. The remaining 131 patients were included in the study. 68 of the patients were women and 63 were men. 79.4% of the patients were diagnostic laparoscopies performed due to emergency circumstances, and 20.6% for abdominal pain evaluation. While the procedure was concluded laparoscopically in 64.9% of the patients, the operation was continued by performing laparotomy in 35.1%. CONCLUSION: Despite the increase in the variety and frequency of use of imaging modalities, a laparoscopic intervention is an essential approach in both diagnosis and treatment when the diagnosis is doubtful, especially in emergency cases in appropriate cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal pain requires rapid diagnosis and treatment, especially in emergency circumstances. Sometimes the diagnosis of the disease cannot be accomplished with laboratory and imaging methods, and an invasive procedure such as diagnostic laparoscopy may be required to obtain a diagnosis. Diagnostic laparoscopy is also performed therapeutically, but laparotomy is inevitable in some cases. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment and to retrospectively examine the factors that force the surgeon to perform a laparotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients over the age of 18 who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy in the general surgery clinic of Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients under 18 years of age and patients diagnosed before surgery were excluded. Demographic data of the patients, whether there was a conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy, postoperative morbidity, and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: The data of 347 patients in total were evaluated retrospectively between the specified dates. 216 of the patients were previously diagnosed, laparoscopic procedures performed for staging purposes and they were not included in the study. The remaining 131 patients were included in the study. 68 of the patients were women and 63 were men. 79.4% of the patients were diagnostic laparoscopies performed due to emergency circumstances, and 20.6% for abdominal pain evaluation. While the procedure was concluded laparoscopically in 64.9% of the patients, the operation was continued by performing laparotomy in 35.1%. CONCLUSION: Despite the increase in the variety and frequency of use of imaging modalities, a laparoscopic intervention is an essential approach in both diagnosis and treatment when the diagnosis is doubtful, especially in emergency cases in appropriate cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal pain requires rapid diagnosis and treatment, especially in emergency circumstances. Sometimes the diagnosis of the disease cannot be accomplished with laboratory and imaging methods, and an invasive procedure such as diagnostic laparoscopy may be required to obtain a diagnosis. Diagnostic laparoscopy is also performed therapeutically, but laparotomy is inevitable in some cases. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment and to retrospectively examine the factors that force the surgeon to perform a laparotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients over the age of 18 who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy in the general surgery clinic of Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients under 18 years of age and patients diagnosed before surgery were excluded. Demographic data of the patients, whether there was a conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy, postoperative morbidity, and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: The data of 347 patients in total were evaluated retrospectively between the specified dates. 216 of the patients were previously diagnosed, laparoscopic procedures performed for staging purposes and they were not included in the study. The remaining 131 patients were included in the study. 68 of the patients were women and 63 were men. 79.4% of the patients were diagnostic laparoscopies performed due to emergency circumstances, and 20.6% for abdominal pain evaluation. While the procedure was concluded laparoscopically in 64.9% of the patients, the operation was continued by performing laparotomy in 35.1%. CONCLUSION: Despite the increase in the variety and frequency of use of imaging modalities, a laparoscopic intervention is an essential approach in both diagnosis and treatment when the diagnosis is doubtful, especially in emergency cases in appropriate cases.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, Surgery, General surgery, Abdominal pain, Retrospective cohort study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WHY DIAGNOSTIC LAPAROSCOPY — Research Paper | ScholarLens