ScholarLens Back to search
2020•Concurrences ReviewRequires access

Non-collusive oligopoly gap: The EU General Court annuls the Commission's prohibition of a four-to-three merger in the UK telecoms sector, in the first judgment to directly deal with the legal test for “gap cases” (Telefónica UK / Hutchison 3G UK)

Simon Vande Walle

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In May 2020, the General Court rendered its long-awaited judgment on the appeal against the Commission's decision to prohibit Hutchison's acquisition of O2, a deal that would have combined two of…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In May 2020, the General Court rendered its long-awaited judgment on the appeal against the Commission's decision to prohibit Hutchison's acquisition of O2, a deal that would have combined two of…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In May 2020, the General Court rendered its long-awaited judgment on the appeal against the Commission's decision to prohibit Hutchison's acquisition of O2, a deal that would have combined two of…

Key concepts: Commission, Appeal, Law, High Court, Oligopoly, European commission, Political science, Law and economics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-collusive oligopoly gap: The EU General Court annuls the Commission's prohibition of a four-to-three merger in the UK telecoms sector, in the first judgment to directly deal with the legal test for “gap cases” (Telefónica UK / Hutchison 3G UK) — Research Paper | ScholarLens